4.6 Article

Effect of Surface Tension, Viscosity, and Process Conditions on Polymer Morphology Deposited at the Liquid-Vapor Interface

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 29, Issue 37, Pages 11640-11645

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la402538e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USC
  2. USC NSF GK-12 graduate fellowship [DGE-1045595]
  3. Chevron Corporation (USC-CVX UPP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have observed that the vapor-phase deposition of polymers onto liquid substrates can result in the formation of polymer films or particles at the liquid vapor interface. In this study, we demonstrate the relationship between the polymer morphology at the liquid vapor interface and the surface tension interaction between the liquid and polymer, the liquid viscosity, the deposition rate, and the deposition time. We show that the thermodynamically stable morphology is determined by the surface tension interaction between the liquid and the polymer. Stable polymer films form when it is energetically favorable for the polymer to spread over the surface of the liquid, whereas polymer particles form when it is energetically favorable for the polymer to aggregate. For systems that do not strongly favor spreading or aggregation, we observe that the initial morphology depends on the deposition rate. Particles form at low deposition rates, whereas unstable films form at high deposition rates. We also observe a transition from particle formation to unstable film formation when we increase the viscosity of the liquid or increase the deposition time. Our results provide a fundamental understanding about polymer growth at the liquid vapor interface and can offer insight into the growth of other materials on liquid surfaces. The ability to systematically tune morphology can enable the production of particles for applications in photonics, electronics, and drug delivery and films for applications in sensing and separations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available