4.6 Article

Polarization of a Diffuse Soft Particle Subjected to an Alternating Current Field

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 28, Issue 30, Pages 11164-11172

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la301889e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UNLV URBAN 21 innovation grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The polarization of a diffuse soft particle submerged in an aqueous electrolyte and subjected to a uniform alternating electric field is theoretically analyzed with the standard electrokinetic model (the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations). The particle consists of a rigid uncharged core and a charged diffuse polyelectrolytic shell (soft layer) permeable to ions and solvent. Our focus is on the impact of the characteristics of the soft layer including the Donnan potential, the soft layer thickness, and the friction coefficient of the soft layer on the dipole coefficient, characterizing the strength of the polarization. Under the limits of thin double layers and thin polyelectrolytic shells, approximate analytical expressions to evaluate the dipole moment coefficients are derived for high-frequency and low-frequency ranges, respectively. The analytical results are compared and agree favorably with those numerically computed by the standard model. Interestingly, we discover that when the double layer is comparable to the soft layer the dipole moment behaves qualitatively differently at different Donnan potentials. When the Donnan potential is small, the dipole moment decreases as the double layer increases. In contrast, at large Donnan potentials, the dipole moment increases with the increase in the double layer. The distinct responses to Donnan potentials are attributed to the impact of the associated double layer on the charge distribution of mobile ions inside the soft layer. The theoretical model provides a fundamental basis for interpreting the polarization of heterogeneous systems, including environmental or biological colloids or microgel particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available