4.6 Article

Low Fluorine Content CO2-philic Surfactants

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages 10562-10569

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la2021885

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia
  2. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  4. Hirosaki University
  5. EPSRC [EP/C523105/1, EP/F020686, EP/I018301/1]
  6. STFC
  7. School of Chemistry at the University of Bristol
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C523105/1, EP/F020686/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23685034] Funding Source: KAKEN
  10. EPSRC [EP/F020686/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article addresses an important, and still unresolved question in the field of CO2 science and technology: what is the minimum fluorine content necessary to obtain a CO2-philic surfactant? A previous publication (Langmuir2002, 18, 3014) suggested there should be an ideal fluorination level: for optimization of possible process applications in CO2, it is important to establish just how little F is needed to render a surfactant CO2-philic. Here, optimum chemical structures for water-in-CO2 (w/c) microemulsion stabilization are identified through a systematic study of CO2-philic surfactant design based on dichain sulfosuccinates. High pressure small-angle neutron scattering (HP-SANS) measurements of reversed micelle formation in CO2 show a clear relationship between F content and CO2 compatibility of any given surfactant. Interestingly, high F content surfactants, having lower limiting aqueous surface tensions, gamma(cmc), also have better performance in CO2, as indicated by lower cloud point pressures, P-trans. The results have important implications for the rational design of CO2-philic surfactants helping to identify the most economic and efficient compounds for emerging CO2 based fluid technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available