4.7 Article

Sintering of glass matrix composites with small rigid inclusions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 2469-2479

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.02.007

Keywords

Glass ceramics; Inclusions; Sintering; Mixing; Powders, solid-state reaction

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [De 598/7, Mu 963/7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effect of dispersed crystalline particle volume content Phi on sintering of glass matrix composites (GMC) for low-temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC) applications. Such composites typically consist of alumo-borositicate glass and alpha-Al2O3 powders of similar average particle size (D-50 approximate to 3 mu m). Sintering shrinkage was observed by dilatometry and heating microscopy and was backed up by glass viscosity measurements. Microstructure analysis revealed that alpha-Al2O3 particles do neither show significant dissolution into the liquid phase nor detectable crystallization throughout LTCC firing schedules. Therefore, in this study alpha-Al2O3 particles were treated as small rigid inclusions. It was found that Phi lowers the shrinkage rate of GMC. While the lowering is small for small Phi and at the early stage of densification it progressively increases during sintering, and final shrinkage shifts up to 170 K to higher temperatures for Phi = 0.45. The behaviour observed could be explained assuming that sintering is controlled by the effective viscosity, which progressively increases non-linearly during densification due to the gradually wetting of the surface area of corundum particles. We could demonstrate that Al2O3 cluster can cause residual pores and reduce the attainable shrinkage. The reduction of attainable shrinkage is found to depend on Phi(3), reaching about 8% at Phi = 0.45. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available