4.4 Article

Number, size, distribution, and hydrologic role of small impoundments in Alabama

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 111-121

Publisher

SOIL WATER CONSERVATION SOC
DOI: 10.2489/jSWC.67.2.111

Keywords

Alabama water resources; ponds; small impoundments; surface water hydrology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A small impoundment (SI) inventory was made by county for Alabama by using Landsat 5 TM satellite imagery from the winter of 2007 to enumerate and measure surface areas of water bodies. The result was identification of 278,787 SIs >0.18 ha (0.44 ac) and <2,000 ha (4,972 ac) in surface area with a combined water surface area of 261,880 ha (647,105 ac). The average surface area of SIs was 0.94 ha (2.32 ac)-84.8% were <1 ha (2.5 ac), and 92.7% were <2 ha (4.94 ac) in area. Ground-truthing in one county revealed that the procedure had an accuracy of 80% in identifying SIs. The density of SIs tended to increase slightly in counties of higher population density. Sonic physiographic provinces had greater density of SIs than others; however, the average surface area of individual ponds did not differ greatly among provinces. The total volume of SIs was estimated to be approximate to 6 km(3) (4,900,000 ac ft) roughly 8.1% of annual runoff for the state. After initial filling by direct precipitation and runoff: are seldom drained, and they overflow after periods of considerable rainfall minimizing retention of runoff. It was estimated that SIs in Alabama lessen annual runoff by about 0.35 cm y(-1) (0.14 in yr(-1)) a reduction of about 0.6% mainly because evaporation from their surfaces exceeds evapotranspiration loss for an equal land area. Nevertheless, SIs probably flatten peaks of downstream hydrographs. It should be possible to use water from SIs to supplement existing water supplies in certain localities, and SIs create open-water, shoreline, and wetland habitat as well as detain and improve the quality of surface runoff.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available