4.7 Article

Potent anti-inflammatory effects of low-dose proteasome inhibition in the vascular system

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
Volume 87, Issue 8, Pages 793-802

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-009-0469-9

Keywords

Proteasome; Inflammation; Adhesion molecules; Cardiovascular; NF-kappa B

Funding

  1. foundation Deutsche Stiftung fur Herzforschung [F/02/05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteasome inhibitors are considered to have anti-inflammatory therapeutic potential. However, recent reports addressing proteasome inhibition in the vascular system are controversial, ranging from beneficial anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects to potentiation of inflammation and oxidative stress. This study was based on the hypothesis that the divergent effects might be a result of a differential and dose-dependent responsiveness of vascular cells to proteasome inhibitors. We tested whether low doses of proteasome inhibitors would favor anti-inflammatory effects in vascular cells in vitro and in vivo. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were preincubated with proteasome inhibitors MG132 and MG262 at concentrations that did not affect cell viability during a 24-h treatment. Upon addition of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) the induced expression of adhesion molecules and the adhesion of monocytic THP-1 cells to HUVECs was significantly lowered. However, nuclear translocation of NF-kappa B was only slightly diminished. Low-dose pretreatment with proteasome inhibitors decreased TNF-alpha-induced generation of reactive oxygen species in HUVEC. Bortezomib was administered at a dose of 50 A mu g/kg body weight to Dahl salt-sensitive rats (DSSR) on high-salt diet. This low-dose proteasome inhibition led to decreased hypertension-induced oxidative stress and reduced expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) in the aortae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available