4.7 Article

Using Doubly-Labeled Water to Measure Energy Expenditure in an Important Small Ectotherm Drosophila melanogaster

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 505-512

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2014.07.004

Keywords

Doubly-labeled water; Respiration rate; Effect of mating status and sex; Drosophila

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB13030000]
  3. BBSRC [BB/I011544/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I011544/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy expenditure is a key variable in the study of ageing, and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a model organism that has been used to make step changes in our understanding of the ageing process. Standard methods for measurement of energy expenditure involve placing individuals in metabolic chambers where their oxygen consumption and CO2 production can be quantified. These measurements require separating individuals from any social context, and may only poorly reflect the environment in which the animals normally live. The doubly-labeled water (DLW) method is an isotope-based technique for measuring energy expenditure which overcomes these problems. However, technical challenges mean that the smallest animals this method has been previously applied to weighed 50-200 mg. We overcame these technical challenges to measure energy demands in Drosophila weighing 0.78 mg. Mass-specific energy expenditure varied between 43 and 65 mW.g(-1). These estimates are considerably higher than estimates using indirect calorimetry of Drosophila in small metabolic chambers (around 18 mW. g(-1)). The methodology we have established extends downwards by three orders of magnitude the size of animals that can be measured using DLW. This approach may be of considerable value in future ageing research attempting to understand the genetic and genomic basis of ageing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available