Effectiveness and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy: A meta-analysis
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Effectiveness and safety of cold versus
hot snare polypectomy: A meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-09-03
DOI
10.1111/jgh.14464
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Safety of Cold Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps in Patients on Antithrombotic Medication
- (2018) Mio Matsumoto et al. DIGESTION
- Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2018) Satoshi Shinozaki et al. Digestive Endoscopy
- Width and depth of resection for small colorectal polyps: hot versus cold snare polypectomy
- (2018) Sho Suzuki et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Polypectomy for complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps
- (2018) Qisheng Zhang et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Wide-field piecemeal cold snare polypectomy of large sessile serrated polyps without a submucosal injection is safe
- (2017) David Tate et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6–10 mm: a randomized trial
- (2017) Vasilios Papastergiou et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline
- (2017) Monika Ferlitsch et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Su1616 One Year Follow-Up After Cold Polypectomy Compared With Hot Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps - a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2017) Masashi Saito et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Sa1056 Delayed Hemorrhage After Cold Versus Hot Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
- (2017) Masato Aizawa et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)
- (2017) Takuji Kawamura et al. GUT
- Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015
- (2017) et al. JAMA Oncology
- Su1734 Randomized Control Trial: Cold SNARE Polypectomy Versus Hot SNARE Polypectomy in Endoscopic Resection of Large Polyps
- (2016) Ajish Pillai et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps
- (2015) Akira Horiuchi et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Tu1496 Cold SNARE Polypectomy Versus Standard SNARE Polypectomy in Endoscopic Treatment of Small Polyps
- (2013) Fatih Aslan et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy
- (2013) Akira Horiuchi et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Incomplete Polyp Resection During Colonoscopy—Results of the Complete Adenoma Resection (CARE) Study
- (2012) Heiko Pohl et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Long-Term Prevention of Colorectal-Cancer Deaths
- (2012) Ann G. Zauber et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- A prospective randomized comparison of cold vs hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps
- (2011) G. A. Paspatis et al. Colorectal Disease
- Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps
- (2011) Yasuyuki Ichise et al. DIGESTION
- 587g: Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
- (2010) Akira Horiuchi et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started