4.7 Article

Reproductive toxicity of Rhizoma Sparganii (Sparganium stoloniferum Buch.-Ham.) in mice: Mechanisms of anti-angiogenesis and anti-estrogen pharmacologic activities

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages 1498-1503

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.08.026

Keywords

Rhizoma Sparganii; Fibroblast growth factor-1; Estrogen receptor-alpha: Vascular endothelial growth factor; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Indications and preliminary studies of Rhizoma Sparganii (RS) suggest its pharmacological mechanism is involved with endocrine/angiogenesis functions. We therefore studied its potential toxicity on reproduction in mice. Materials and methods: Reproductive toxicity of 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg RS extract were studied in pregnant ICR mice and its offspring. The embryos fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and estrogen receptor-a (ER-a) were evaluated as targets of endocrine/angiogenesis by immunohistochemical test. Results: The offspring of treated mice (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg RS extract) during their pregnancy had various pathological conditions, suggesting an abnormal FGF signaling phenomenon during pregnancy. Embryos from the 400 mg/kg group had significantly depressed levels of FGF-1 (P < 0.01) and VEGF (P < 0.05) expression levels as compared to controls by immunohistochemical test. Dysplasia in the heart (12.9%), craniofacial region (18.3%) and vertebrae (32.5%) presented in embryos of the 400 mg/kg group. Furthermore, the ER-a expression was inversely proportional to FGF-1 levels in the same embryo (P < 0.01). Conclusions: These results implicate a FGF signaling abnormality in vivo and indicate that RS has anti-angiogenesis and anti-estrogen toxicity effects in pregnant rodents. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available