4.7 Article

Effect of plants used in Mexico to treat gastrointestinal disorders on charcoal-gum acacia-induced hyperperistalsis in rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages 49-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.12.022

Keywords

Medicinal plant; Geranium mexicanum; Artemisia absinthium; Matricaria recutita; Methanolic extract; Charcoal meal test; Hyperperistalsis; Diarrhea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ethnopharmacological relevance: A total of 28 plant extracts, belonging to 26 different plant species are commonly used in Traditional Mexican Medicine for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhea. Aim of the study: To evaluate the effect of medicinal plant extracts on induced hyperperistalsis in rats. Materials and methods: Charcoal meal test was used in this study. Extracts were tested at a dose of 300 mg/kg. Results: From all the plant extracts tested, only Geranium mexicanum (roots) showed 100% of inhibition. The extracts of Artemisia absinthium, Matricaria recutita, Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Lygodium venustum, Chenopodium ambrosoides (green variety), Aloysia triphylla, Artemisia ludoviciana, Chiranthodendron pentadactylon, and Cocos nucifera showed moderate inhibitory activity with values ranging from 30 to 57%. Their activities were greater than that of or equal to loperamide (34% of inhibition at doses of 10 mg/kg) drug used as control. The remaining plants exhibited marginal or null inhibitory effect on hyperpropulsive movement of the small intestine. Conclusions: The results obtained in this study give some scientific support to the popular use of 23 of the plants tested for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhea in Mexican traditional medicine. However, roots of Geranium mexicanum should be used in herbal medicine with care to avoid toxicity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available