4.7 Article

Dual effects of crude extracts obtained from Petiveria alliacea L. (Phytolaccaceae) on experimental anxiety in mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages 541-544

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.01.012

Keywords

Petiveria alliacea L.; Anxiolytic; Anxiogenic; Total flavonoids; Mice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim of study. Different preparations obtained from P alliacea have been traditionally used in South America and Brazil for many medical conditions To investigate the effects of fresh whole plant (WP) extract, aerial part (AP) extract, and root (R) extract obtained from Petiveria alliacea using the elevated plus maze (EPM) model of anxiety in mice Total flavonoid content present in Petiveria alliacea extracts was also determined Materials and methods WP. AP, or R (300-900 mg/kg) extracts were orally administered to mice 30 min before they were subjected to the EPM and open field test Total flavonoid content present in the extracts was determined by spectrophotometry Results The WP extract (300 and 900 mg/kg)caused anxiolytic-like effects, and the AP extract (300 mg/kg) induced anxiogenic-like effects in mice subjected to the EPM No effect on anxiety-like behavior was observed with acute administration of the R extract The content of flavonoids present in the AP extract (1 34%) was almost threefold higher than the flavonoid content present in the WP extract (0 52%) Conclusions Preparations using different fresh parts of Petiveria alliacea caused opposite effects on experimental anxiety in mice However, predicting the extent to which flavonoid content present in Petiveria alliacea extracts differentially Induces anxiolysis or anxiogenesis in mice was not possible Further studies will be necessary to elucidate the effects of flavonoids or other substances present in Petiveria alliacea extracts on experimental anxiety (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available