How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study

Screening for, Monitoring, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 1 to 3: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

(2013) Howard A. Fink   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Health inequalities: the need to move beyond bad behaviours: Table 1

(2013) Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi et al.   JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study

(2013) Sally Hopewell et al.   BMJ Open

Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study

(2013) A. Dechartres et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews

(2012) Jonathan R. Treadwell et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Quality appraisal in systematic reviews of public health interventions: an empirical study on the impact of choice of tool on meta-analysis

(2012) Peer H Voss et al.   JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH

Nosocomial Rotavirus Infections: A Meta-analysis

(2012) Patricia Bruijning-Verhagen et al.   PEDIATRICS

Improvement of the lipid profile with exercise in obese children: A systematic review

(2012) Yolanda Escalante et al.   PREVENTIVE MEDICINE

Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program

(2011) Susan L. Norris et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

AHRQ Series Commentary 1: Rating the evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews

(2010) Yngve Falck-Ytter et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research

(2010) Susan Armijo-Olivo et al.   JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy

(2009) Anne M. Moseley et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

AHRQ Series Paper 2: Principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program

(2009) Mark Helfand et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program

(2009) Douglas K. Owens et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Real world reviews: a beginner's guide to undertaking systematic reviews of public health policy interventions

(2009) C. Bambra   JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

(2008) Lesley Wood et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?

(2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

(2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal