How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study
出版年份 2014 全文链接
标题
How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study
作者
关键词
-
出版物
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 189-195
出版商
BMJ
发表日期
2014-12-07
DOI
10.1136/jech-2014-204711
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Screening for, Monitoring, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 1 to 3: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline
- (2013) Howard A. Fink ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Health inequalities: the need to move beyond bad behaviours: Table 1
- (2013) Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
- (2013) Sally Hopewell et al. BMJ Open
- Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
- (2013) A. Dechartres et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews
- (2012) Jonathan R. Treadwell et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Quality appraisal in systematic reviews of public health interventions: an empirical study on the impact of choice of tool on meta-analysis
- (2012) Peer H Voss et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- Nosocomial Rotavirus Infections: A Meta-analysis
- (2012) Patricia Bruijning-Verhagen et al. PEDIATRICS
- Improvement of the lipid profile with exercise in obese children: A systematic review
- (2012) Yolanda Escalante et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
- (2011) Susan L. Norris et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AHRQ Series Commentary 1: Rating the evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews
- (2010) Yngve Falck-Ytter et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research
- (2010) Susan Armijo-Olivo et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy
- (2009) Anne M. Moseley et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AHRQ Series Paper 2: Principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program
- (2009) Mark Helfand et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program
- (2009) Douglas K. Owens et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Real world reviews: a beginner's guide to undertaking systematic reviews of public health policy interventions
- (2009) C. Bambra JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
- (2008) Lesley Wood et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started