4.4 Article

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Hydrated DPPC Monolayers Using Charge Equilibration Force Fields

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 141-152

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21927

Keywords

monolayers; DPPC; molecular dynamics; force field; polarizable; charge equilibrium

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware) [COBRE:5P20RR017716-07]
  2. COBRE (Chemical Engineering) [P20-RR015588]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results of molecular dynamics simulations of a model DPPC-water monolayer using charge equilibration (CHEQ) force fields, which explicitly account for electronic polarization in a classical treatment of intermolecular interactions. The surface pressure, determined as the difference between the monolayer and pure water surface tensions at 323 K, is predicted to be 22.92 +/- 1.29dyne/cm, just slightly below the broad range of experimental values reported for this system. The surface tension for the DPPC-water monolayer is predicted to be 42.35 +/- 1.16dyne/cm, in close agreement with the experimentally determined value of 40.9 dyne/cm. This surface tension is also consistent with the value obtained from DPPC monolayer simulations using state-of-the-art nonpolarizable force fields. The current results of simulations predict a monolayer-water potential difference relative to the pure water-air interface of 0.64 +/- 0.02 Volts, an improved prediction compared to the fixed-charge CHARMM27 force field, yet still overestimating the experimental range of 0.3 to 0.45 Volts. As the charge equilibration model is a purely charge-based model for polarization, the current results suggest that explicitly modeled polarization effects can offer improvements in describing interfacial electrostatics in such systems. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 33: 141-152, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available