4.7 Article

Study of lead (II) adsorption onto activated carbon originating from cow bone

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 342-349

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.020

Keywords

Metal removal; Environmental technology; Adsorption; Lead; Activated carbon

Funding

  1. ANP/MECPETRO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the adsorption of lead (Pb2+) onto activated carbon (AC) originating from cow bone, chemically modified with HNO3, was investigated. Physico-chemical carbon characterization assays and the determination of the optimum pH conditions and contact time, as well as studies on the kinetic and isothermal equilibrium and adsorbent reuse, were carried out. The AC presented a greater amount of acid functional groups than basic groups at the surface, making it efficient for cationic exchange. The pH(PZC) was 4.0 and the minimum contact time required for the assays to be performed was 6 h. It was observed that the time required to reach kinetic equilibrium decreased with increasing initial metal concentration in solution and the values found for q(exp) were 32.1, 50.1 and 42.3 mg g(-1) for concentrations of 100, 150 and 200 mg L-1, respectively. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model best represented the experimental data for all initial lead concentrations studied, presenting good linear correlation coefficients. The Langmuir and Freundlich models were used to fit the experimental data and these showed good correlations, with the Langmuir model providing a better description of the equilibrium (higher R-2 value). It was verified that the HCl desorption showed the highest efficiency; the minimum time to reach the desorption equilibrium was 3 h and the recovery was approximately 50%. The proposed adsorption process efficiently removes lead present in aqueous solution and can be used in industrial processes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available