4.6 Article

Thermo-responsive polymer brush-grafted porous polystyrene beads for all-aqueous chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1217, Issue 4, Pages 522-529

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.073

Keywords

Thermo-responsive polymer; Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide); Atom transfer radical polymerization; Polymer brush

Funding

  1. Ministryof Environment, Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19591568]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20106004, 21390012, 19591568] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PIPAAm) brush-grafted porous polystyrene beads with variable grafted polymer densities were prepared using surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) for applications in thermo-responsive chromatography. Utilization of these grafted beads as a stationary phase in aqueous chromatographic analysis of insulin provides a graft density-dependent analyte retention behavior. The separations calibration curve on PIPAAm-grafted polystyrene was obtained using pullulan standards and exhibited inflection points attributed to analyte diffusion into bead pores and partitioning into grafted PIPAAm brush surfaces. Presence of these inflection points supports a separation mechanism where insulin penetrates pores in polystyrene beads and hydrophobically interacts with PIPAAm brushes grafted within the pores. Control of PIPAAm brush graft density on polystyrene facilitates effective aqueous phase separation of peptides based on thermally modulated hydrophobic interactions with grafted PIPAAm within stationary phase pores. These results indicated that PIPAAm brush-grafted porous polystyrene beads prepared by surface-initiated ATRP was effective stationary phase of thermo-responsive chromatography for aqueous phase peptide separations. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available