4.7 Article

Accurate basis set truncation for wavefunction embedding

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4811112

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U. S. Army Research Laboratory
  2. U. S. Army Research Office (USARO) [W911NF-10-1-0202]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (USAFOSR) [FA9550-11-1-0288]
  4. Office of Naval Research (ONR) [N00014-10-1-0884]
  5. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship
  6. Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation New Faculty Award
  7. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional theory (DFT) provides a formally exact framework for performing embedded subsystem electronic structure calculations, including DFT-in-DFT and wavefunction theory-in-DFT descriptions. In the interest of efficiency, it is desirable to truncate the atomic orbital basis set in which the subsystem calculation is performed, thus avoiding high-order scaling with respect to the size of the MO virtual space. In this study, we extend a recently introduced projection-based embedding method [F. R. Manby, M. Stella, J. D. Goodpaster, and T. F. Miller III, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 2564 (2012)] to allow for the systematic and accurate truncation of the embedded subsystem basis set. The approach is applied to both covalently and non-covalently bound test cases, including water clusters and polypeptide chains, and it is demonstrated that errors associated with basis set truncation are controllable to well within chemical accuracy. Furthermore, we show that this approach allows for switching between accurate projection-based embedding and DFT embedding with approximate kinetic energy (KE) functionals; in this sense, the approach provides a means of systematically improving upon the use of approximate KE functionals in DFT embedding. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available