4.7 Article

Photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio study of boron-carbon mixed clusters: CB9- and C2B8-

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 137, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4770231

Keywords

ab initio calculations; atomic clusters; bonds (chemical); boron; carbon; negative ions; photoelectron spectra

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-0904034, CHE-1057746]
  2. J. W. Fulbright Commission
  3. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0059-10]
  4. Slovak Grant Agency VEGA [1/0520/10]
  5. Research and Development Operational Program [ITMS 26240120025]
  6. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1057746] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Materials Research
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [904034] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We performed a joint photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio study of two carbon-doped boron clusters, CB9- and C2B8-. Unbiased computational searches revealed similar global minimum structures for both clusters. The comparison of the experimentally observed and theoretically calculated vertical detachment energies revealed that only the global minimum structure is responsible for the experimental spectra of CB9-, whereas the two lowest-lying isomers of C2B8- contribute to the experimental spectra. The planar distorted wheel type structures with a single inner boron atom found for CB9- and C2B8- are different from the quasi-planar structure of B-10(-), which consists of two inner atoms and eight peripheral boron atoms. The adaptive natural density partitioning chemical bonding analysis revealed that CB9- and C2B8 clusters exhibit pi aromaticity and sigma antiaromaticity, which is consistent with their planar distorted structures. (C) 2012 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4770231]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available