4.5 Article

AII amacrine cells discriminate between heterocellular and homocellular locations when assembling connexin36-containing gap junctions

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 127, Issue 6, Pages 1190-1202

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.133066

Keywords

Gap junction; Electrical synapse; connexin; Amacrine cell; Bipolar cell; Retina

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT078791]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [We849/16-1/2]
  3. PhD programme Neurosenses stipend

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrical synapses (gap junctions) rapidly transmit signals between neurons and are composed of connexins. In neurons, connexin36 (Cx36) is the most abundant isoform; however, the mechanisms underlying formation of Cx36-containing electrical synapses are unknown. We focus on homocellular and heterocellular gap junctions formed by an AII amacrine cell, a key interneuron found in all mammalian retinas. In mice lacking native Cx36 but expressing a variant tagged with enhanced green fluorescent protein at the C-terminus (KO-Cx36-EGFP), heterocellular gap junctions formed between AII cells and ON cone bipolar cells are fully functional, whereas homocellular gap junctions between two AII cells are not formed. A tracer injected into an AII amacrine cell spreads into ON cone bipolar cells but is excluded from other AII cells. Reconstruction of Cx36-EGFP clusters on an AII cell in the KO-Cx36-EGFP genotype confirmed that the number, but not average size, of the clusters is reduced - as expected for AII cells lacking a subset of electrical synapses. Our studies indicate that some neurons exhibit at least two discriminatory mechanisms for assembling Cx36. We suggest that employing different gapjunction- forming mechanisms could provide the means for a cell to regulate its gap junctions in a target-cell-specific manner, even if these junctions contain the same connexin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available