How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 1605-1614
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2015-05-17
DOI
10.1093/ndt/gfv209
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Capture, Transfer, and Feedback of Patient-Centered Outcomes Data in Palliative Care Populations: Does It Make a Difference? A Systematic Review
- (2015) Simon Noah Etkind et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
- Measuring Shared Decision Making: A Review of Constructs, Measures, and Opportunities for Cardiovascular Care
- (2014) K. R. Sepucha et al.
- Evaluation of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems In-Center Hemodialysis Survey
- (2014) R. Wood et al. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Patient participation in clinical encounters: a systematic review to identify self-report measures
- (2014) Brian Mavis et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- The use of data from national and other large-scale user experience surveys in local quality work: a systematic review
- (2014) Mona Haugum et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
- The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research
- (2014) Maria B Boyce et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
- (2014) Suetonia C Palmer et al. BMJ Open
- Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments
- (2013) Karen R Sepucha et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence
- (2013) Hilary L Bekker et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Population-based cancer registries for quality-of-life research
- (2013) Melissa S. Y. Thong et al. CANCER
- Mapping health outcome measures from a stroke registry to eq-5d weights
- (2013) Ola Ghatnekar et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Factors associated with health-related quality of life in renal transplant recipients: results of a national survey in France
- (2013) Stéphanie Gentile et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials
- (2013) Melanie Calvert et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Validation of SURE, a Four-Item Clinical Checklist for Detecting Decisional Conflict in Patients
- (2013) Audrey Ferron Parayre et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters
- (2013) Glyn Elwyn et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare
- (2013) N. Black BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Assess, compare and enhance the status of Persons with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in Europe: a European Register for MS
- (2012) M. Pugliatti et al. ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
- Feasibility of 4 patient-reported outcome measures in a registry setting
- (2012) Aksel Paulsen et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- Experiences of Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries With ESRD: Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Survey Results
- (2012) Charlotte A.M. Paddison et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
- Development and validation of the Consumer Quality index instrument to measure the experience and priority of chronic dialysis patients
- (2012) S. N. van der Veer et al. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
- Development of a shared decision making coding system for analysis of patient–healthcare provider encounters
- (2012) Marla L. Clayman et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Analysis of three outcome measures in moderate to severe psoriasis: a registry-based study of 2450 patients
- (2011) J.M. Norlin et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
- Satisfaction with Renal Replacement Therapy and Education: The American Association of Kidney Patients Survey
- (2011) S. Z. Fadem et al. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: Scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts
- (2011) Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Patients' and Observers' Perceptions of Involvement Differ. Validation Study on Inter-Relating Measures for Shared Decision Making
- (2011) Jürgen Kasper et al. PLoS One
- In-Center Hemodialysis Six Times per Week versus Three Times per Week
- (2010) NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: Do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions?
- (2010) Hilary L. Bekker PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: A theory analysis
- (2009) Dawn Stacey et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample
- (2009) Levente Kriston et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?
- (2008) Joanne Greenhalgh QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
- (2008) Peter Craig et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started