4.5 Article

Cognitive demand and predictive adaptational responses in dynamic stability control

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 45, Issue 14, Pages 2330-2336

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.009

Keywords

Predictive control; Dual tasking; Gait perturbation; After-effects; Aging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the effects of a concurrent cognitive task on predictive motor control, a feedforward mechanism of dynamic stability control, during disturbed gait in young and old adults. Thirty-two young and 27 elderly male healthy subjects participated and were randomly assigned to either control or dual task groups. By means of a covered exchangeable element the surface condition on a gangway could be altered to induce gait perturbations. The experimental protocol included a baseline on hard surface and an adaptation phase with twelve trials on soft surface. After the first, sixth and last soft surface trial, the surface condition was changed to hard (H1-3), to examine after-effects and, thus, to quantify predictive motor control. Dynamic stability was assessed using the 'margin of stability (MoS)' as a criterion for the stability state of the human body (extrapolated center of mass concept). In H1-3 the young participants significantly increased the MoS at touchdown of the disturbed leg compared to baseline. The magnitude and the rate of these after-effects were unaffected by the dual task condition. The old participants presented a trend to after-effects (i.e., increase of MoS) in H3 but only under the dual task condition. In conclusion, the additional cognitive demand did not compromise predictive motor control during disturbed walking in the young and old participants. In contrast to the control group, the old dual task group featured a trend to predictive motor adjustments, which may be a result of a higher state of attention or arousal due to the dual task paradigm. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available