Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 922-929
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2014-03-08
DOI
10.1093/ije/dyu005
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Efficient Design for Mendelian Randomization Studies: Subsample and 2-Sample Instrumental Variable Estimators
- (2013) B. L. Pierce et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization
- (2013) Stephen Burgess et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Identifying the odds ratio estimated by a two-stage instrumental variable analysis with a logistic regression model
- (2013) Stephen Burgess et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies
- (2012) Roger M. Harbord et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Use of Mendelian randomisation to assess potential benefit of clinical intervention
- (2012) S. Burgess et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Missing Data Methods in Mendelian Randomization Studies With Multiple Instruments
- (2011) S. Burgess et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Instrumental Variable Estimation of Causal Risk Ratios and Causal Odds Ratios in Mendelian Randomization Analyses
- (2011) T. M. Palmer et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies
- (2011) Stephen Burgess et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- On Instrumental Variables Estimation of Causal Odds Ratios
- (2011) Stijn Vansteelandt et al. STATISTICAL SCIENCE
- Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: Analysis of bias
- (2011) Bing Cai et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Bias in causal estimates from Mendelian randomization studies with weak instruments
- (2011) Stephen Burgess et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants
- (2010) Brandon L Pierce et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Assumptions of IV Methods for Observational Epidemiology
- (2010) Vanessa Didelez et al. STATISTICAL SCIENCE
- Mendelian Randomization: How It Can--and Cannot--Help Confirm Causal Relations between Nutrition and Cancer
- (2009) A. Schatzkin et al. Cancer Prevention Research
- Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses
- (2008) Tom M Palmer et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology
- (2007) Debbie A. Lawlor et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now