4.7 Article

New constitutive model for high-temperature deformation behavior of inconel 718 superalloy

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 108-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.001

Keywords

Hot deformation; Alloy; Constitutive model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51375502]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program [2013CB035801]
  3. Key Laboratory of Efficient & Clean Energy Utilization, College of Hunan Province [2014NGQ001]
  4. Sheng-hua Yu-ying Program of Central South University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hot deformation behavior of an aged inconel 718 superalloy is investigated by isothermal compression tests over wide ranges of strain rate and deformation temperature. In this study, the effects of hot deformation parameters (deformation temperature and strain rate) on flow stress are analyzed. It is found that the flow stress of the studied superalloy is significantly affected by deformation temperature and strain rate. The flow stress decreases with the decrease of strain rate or the increase of deformation temperature. Based on the experimental results, a new constitutive model is developed to describe the hot deformation behavior. For the work hardening-dynamic recovery stage, an isotropic internal variable is used to represent the plastic deformation resistance, and a viscoplastic constitutive model is developed to describe the work hardening and dynamic recovery behavior. For the dynamic softening stage, the phenomenological constitutive models, which consider the coupled effects of deformation temperature, strain rate and strain on hot deformation behavior, are developed. The predicted flow stresses are in a good agreement with the experimental ones, indicating that the developed models can accurately characterize the hot deformation behavior of the studied Ni-based superalloy. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available