4.8 Article

Fault Detection and Compensation for Linear Systems Over Networks With Random Delays and Clock Asynchronism

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 58, Issue 9, Pages 4396-4406

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2010.2103533

Keywords

Fault compensation; fault detection (FD); intermittent observations; likelihood ratio (LR); networked control systems (NCSs)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60974011, 60904086]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of the People's Republic of China [NCET-08-0047]
  3. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20091101110023]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
  5. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [4102053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a fault detection and compensation scheme based on likelihood ratios (LRs) for networked predictive control systems with random network-induced time delays and clock asynchronism. The compensator is applied to compensate for the network-induced time delays. The measured outputs are sent back to the local node with random delays and the observer updates based on the time schedule of a remote node clock to avoid the deficiency of asynchronism. Two schemes are proposed in this paper to update the LRs of fault. One of them is to set up a buffer in the local node to save the measured outputs out of sequence, and the observer processes the measured outputs one by one in their original sequence. The other scheme is to discard the measured outputs that are out of sequence; thus, the observer has to estimate the state and update the LRs with intermittent observations. The convergence analysis of a generalized LR test with intermittent observations is proposed as well. A numerical simulation is also given to validate the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available