4.6 Article

Coaxial Needle Insertion Assistant With Enhanced Force Feedback

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 379-389

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2227316

Keywords

Force feedback; haptics; needle insertion; surgery

Funding

  1. Scuola Interpolitecnica di Dottorato Milano Torino e Bari
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 EB006435]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science under Excellent Young Researcher Overseas Visit Program
  4. Johns Hopkins University, Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
  5. Politecnico di Milano, Italy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many medical procedures involving needle insertion into soft tissues, such as anesthesia, biopsy, brachytherapy, and placement of electrodes, are performed without image guidance. In such procedures, haptic detection of changing tissue properties at different depths during needle insertion is important for needle localization and detection of subsurface structures. However, changes in tissue mechanical properties deep inside the tissue are difficult for human operators to sense, because the relatively large friction force between the needle shaft and the surrounding tissue masks the smaller tip forces. A novel robotic coaxial needle insertion assistant, which enhances operator force perception, is presented. This one-degree-of-freedom cable-driven robot provides to the operator a scaled version of the force applied by the needle tip to the tissue, using a novel design and sensors that separate the needle tip force from the shaft friction force. The ability of human operators to use the robot to detect membranes embedded in artificial soft tissue was tested under the conditions of 1) tip force and shaft force feedback, and 2) tip force only feedback. The ratio of successful to unsuccessful membrane detections was significantly higher (up to 50%) when only the needle tip force was provided to the user.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available