4.6 Article

Magnetic Microwire Probes for the Magnetic Rod Interfacial Stress Rheometer

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 1410-1420

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la5038316

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UNED's Researchers Formation Program
  2. MINECO [FIS2013-47350-C5-5-R, FIS2012-38231-C02-01]
  3. E.U. through ITN Cowet
  4. PICATA fellowship of the Moncloa Campus of International Excellence (UCM-UPM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The magnetic needle interfacial shear rheometer is a valuable tool for the study of the mechanical properties of thin fluid films or monolayers. However, it is difficult to differentiate the interfacial and subphase contributions to the drag on the needle. In principle, the problem can be addressed by decreasing the needle diameter, which decreases the bulk contribution while the interfacial contribution remains essentially the same. Here we show the results obtained when using a new type of needle, that of magnetic microwires with diameter approximately 10 times thinner than for commercial needles. We show that the lower inertia of the microwires calls for a new calibration procedure. We propose such a new calibration procedure based on the flow field solution around the needle introduced in refs 1 and 2. By measuring thin silicone oil films with well-controlled interfacial viscosities as well as eicosanol (C-20) and pentadecanoic acid (PDA, C-15) Langmuir monolayers, we show that the new calibration method works well for standard needles as well as for the microwire probes. Moreover, we show that the analysis of the force terms contributing to the force on the needle helps to ascertain whether the measurements obtained are reliable for given surface shear viscosity values. We also show that the microwire probes have at least a 10-fold-lower resolution limit, allowing one to measure interfacial viscosities as low as 10(-7) N m/s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available