How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 703-714
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2013-08-05
DOI
10.1111/hex.12117
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Health behaviour advice to cancer patients: the perspective of social network members
- (2013) K Williams et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- The Right Tool Is What They Need, Not What We Have
- (2012) Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
- Informed consent on trial
- (2012) Daniel Cressey NATURE
- Psychosocial Determinants of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Screening Participation: A Conceptual Framework
- (2011) C. von Wagner et al. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS
- Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences
- (2011) Christian von Wagner et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- A framework for the evaluation of patient information leaflets
- (2011) Mark Garner et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer screening uptake: Does time perspective play a role?
- (2011) Katriina L. Whitaker et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England
- (2011) Christian von Wagner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Thinking aloud is not a form of introspection but a qualitatively different methodology: Reply to Schooler (2011).
- (2011) K. Anders Ericsson et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Statistical Numeracy for Health
- (2010) Mirta Galesic ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap
- (2010) Glyn Elwyn et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- A Demonstration of ‘‘Less Can Be More’’ in Risk Graphics
- (2010) Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods.
- (2010) Mark C. Fox et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: The role of information processing
- (2009) Christian von Wagner et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model
- (2008) Sian K Smith et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening
- (2008) Chris Woodrow et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- A Theory of Medical Decision Making and Health: Fuzzy Trace Theory
- (2008) Valerie F. Reyna MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): A qualitative study
- (2008) Alison Chapple et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started