The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent
Authors
Keywords
Clinical relevance, Minimal important difference, Pain disability index, Occupational rehabilitation, Interpretation of change, Chronic pain
Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature America, Inc
Online
2018-09-14
DOI
10.1186/s12955-018-1000-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Dutch Dataset Pain Rehabilitation in daily practice: Content, patient characteristics and reference data
- (2016) A.J.A. Köke et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
- Cost-effectiveness of 40-hour versus 100-hour vocational rehabilitation on work participation for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- (2015) Timo T. Beemster et al. Trials
- Extensive Validation of the Pain Disability Index in 3 Groups of Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain
- (2013) Remko Soer et al. SPINE
- Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
- (2013) Derk A van Kampen et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Evaluating Common Outcomes for Measuring Treatment Success for Chronic Low Back Pain
- (2011) Jens R. Chapman et al. SPINE
- Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Change of the Pain Disability Index in Patients With Chronic Back Pain
- (2011) Remko Soer et al. SPINE
- A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
- (2011) Madeleine T King Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content
- (2010) Lidwine B Mokkink et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes
- (2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
- (2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- What is “normal” disability? An investigation of disability in the general population
- (2009) Ricarda Mewes et al. PAIN
- Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain
- (2009) Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo et al. SPINE
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
- (2007) Dennis Revicki et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations
- (2007) Robert H. Dworkin et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started