Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Authors
Keywords
Shoulder, PROM, Interpretation, MIC, SDC, DASH, Simple shoulder test, Oxford shoulder score
Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 40
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-11-14
DOI
10.1186/1749-799x-8-40
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- When Minimal Detectable Change Exceeds a Diagnostic Test–Based Threshold Change Value for an Outcome Measure: Resolving the Conflict
- (2012) Paul W. Stratford et al. PHYSICAL THERAPY
- Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients
- (2011) Kathleen J. Yost et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist
- (2011) Caroline B. Terwee et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
- (2011) Madeleine T King Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- Minimal Clinically Important Differences in ASES and Simple Shoulder Test Scores After Nonoperative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
- (2010) Robert Z. Tashjian et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
- The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Minimal change is sensitive, less specific to recovery: a diagnostic testing approach to interpretability
- (2010) Dorcas E. Beaton et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Simple Shoulder Test Is Responsive in Assessing Change Following Shoulder Arthroplasty
- (2010) Jean-SéBastien Roy et al. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY
- Validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford Shoulder Score
- (2010) Thomas Berendes et al. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
- Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened disability arm shoulder hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire
- (2010) Kate Polson et al. MANUAL THERAPY
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes
- (2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
- (2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Modification of the Upper Limb Functional Index to a Three-point Response Improves Clinimetric Properties
- (2009) Charles Philip Gabel et al. Journal of Hand Therapy
- Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain
- (2009) Paul E. Mintken et al. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
- The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure
- (2008) WS Lu et al. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
- (2007) Dennis Revicki et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started