大夏天不保温 2023-07-26

Is there any other way to track the status of journal submissions besides contacting the corresponding author?

Ryan Zhang 2023-07-19

4.10 Submission
5.1 Major revision
5.25 Revised manuscript received
6.18 Major revision
6.28 Revised manuscript received
7.12 Minor revision
7.14 Revised manuscript received
7.18 Accepted

This work has been submitted for almost a year now. The submission to jmcc took over three months, going through two rounds of major revisions and one round of minor revisions. It can be seen that the reviewers were not from the same field, but they reviewed the article very carefully, raising nearly 50 questions in total. Finally, it was accepted. This was a test and a valuable experience for me. It left a deep impression on me.

蒜茄子 2023-06-30

Posted on June 21st, it is still in the hands of the assistant editor. I have never experienced such a slow process before, and I am slightly worried.

Ryan Zhang 2023-05-10

Just wondering, when will jmcc send a reminder email to submit the revised draft?

Teng 2023-04-25

The processing speed is quite fast, and the reviewers are serious and professional.
2.19 submitting
2.21 with editor
3.1 in peer review
3.16 major revision (3 major revisions, 1 minor revision, 1 rejection, editor suggested major revision)
3.31 revision submitting
4.1 with editor
4.12 in peer review
4.24 accepted.

除夕了 2023-04-23

About a month, accepted, thank you for editing.

耳同学 2023-04-19

April 15th - Submission deadline
April 17th - In peer review

耳同学 2023-03-17

CEJ submission rejected (6 reviewers, 2 rejections, 3 minor revisions, 1 major revision). Submitted to JMCC on February 4th, received with editor on February 7th, in peer review on February 10th. Major revision requested on March 15th (three revisions, two positive and one negative feedback, editor requested major revision without additional experiments). Looking forward to a prompt acceptance after revisions. Focus on absorption direction, materials used are relatively outdated, conducted first-principles calculations, experimental data is comprehensive.

小虾米 2023-03-09

2023-1-29: Submitted in the evening, the publishing house transferred it to the editor the next day.
2023-2-1: Under review.
2023-2-11: Major revisions.
2023-2-25: Revisions (no additional experiments requested, but the advisor gave us two weeks to make modifications, showing that we are making diligent changes).
2023-3-8: Accepted.
The efficiency is truly praiseworthy, a very good submission experience. The journal, editor, and reviewers were all very fast, and did not waste the author's time.

wuuuyyy 2023-03-08

JMCA was rejected, the editor said that JMCC had the same requirements, and decisively rejected the manuscript.

hello2015 2023-02-28

Not as fast as without comments.

hello2015 2023-02-28

2.20 submission until now continuously with editor

YXQ 2023-02-22

How long has everyone's initial assessment been? Mine has been a week.

章台柳 2023-02-14

2023-2-14 initial assessment/ With Editor

Translation: On February 14, 2023, an initial evaluation will be conducted with the editor.

章台柳 2023-02-13

2023-2-13 Verificando envío y archivos

以利沙 2023-01-26

11.17 Submission
12.1 Under review
12.26 Received reviewer's comments
1.3 Resubmission
1.25 Accepted
The reviewers and editors of the Journal of Materials Chemistry C are very diligent, and the review process is also very efficient. I hope the journal continues to improve and excel.

chenyu cao 2023-01-18

Will be sent to the corresponding author.

暴躁壮壮 2023-01-17

Hello, I would like to ask where can I see the article tracking link?

Jinle Fan 2023-01-16

The first review took one month, and after more than 40 days of minor revisions, the manuscript was accepted.

chenyu cao 2023-01-15

May I ask how many reviewers you have sent the edited version to?

chenyu cao 2023-01-15

Submitted on November 16th.
Changed from "In peer review" to "With editor" on January 8th,
Then changed back to "In peer review" on January 15th.
I would like to ask if the editor sends the manuscript to the reviewers one by one. I noticed that the article tracking link initially showed one reviewer agreeing to review, but after it changed to "In peer review" on January 15th, it showed two reviewers agreeing to review.

Jin le Fan 2023-01-03

I posted it in early November and received minor revisions on December 3rd. The revised version was returned on the 4th. It has been a month now and it is still in peer review. What is this situation? If anyone has encountered a similar situation, please advise!!!

chuan26 2022-12-30

11.10 submitted
12.4 major revision
12.18 resubmitted
12.29 accept
The process was very fast, and it was accepted before the end of the year. Prof. Renaud Demadrille also handled the manuscript very quickly, thank you.

图腾ssssss 2022-11-21

Submit JMCA, the editor feels that it does not fit the theme of the magazine and suggests submitting to JMCC instead. After submitting to JMCC, the feedback came back after half a month, with one major revision and one minor revision. The feedback was very constructive. Finally, the revised version was accepted after about a week of replying to the feedback. Overall, the process was quite fast. I hope it will continue to improve.

努力努力发Paper 2022-11-15

11.15 received.

努力努力发Paper 2022-11-14

9.28投 (Submitted on 9/28)
10.25收到审稿意见 (Received review comments on 10/25)
11.13回稿，再次送审 (Revised manuscript and resubmitted on 11/13)
等待~~ (Waiting~~)
希望好结果！ (Hoping for a good outcome!)

abzhoeey 2022-11-10

The latest one, but written the best and received the fastest. Submitted in early August, received feedback on the manuscript by the end of September. There were two reviewers, both very friendly, and after making revisions, it was accepted at lightning speed. Electromagnetic wave direction.

Yi-Chuan Huang 2022-11-10

Hello, I would like to ask, which editor did you choose?

平常昕 2022-10-28

My status has not changed repeatedly, I am just waiting for the results after peer review. Is it because the editor couldn't find suitable reviewers for yours?

葡萄不愤怒 2022-10-26

Excuse me, how many times have you changed with the editor and peer review? My every review is very short, I'm crying.