见阳遇云 2023-07-24

7.1 submit
7.11 with editor
7.12 under review

Translation:
7.1 submit
7.11 with editor
7.12 under review

临窗观景1 2023-07-19

AFM is under review, and the reviewer suggests revisions. The editor suggests submitting it to AHM, and after submitting, it is directly accepted. AHM's process is very fast and excellent!

Ajun-np 2023-07-01

How long does it take to receive the specific feedback after returning the manuscript? And does the system display "under review" after returning the manuscript? Thank you.

不想上班想摸鱼 2023-06-30

April 2023, submit
Approximately one week for review
Receive reviewer's comments in June 2023, major revisions
Return reviewer's comments by the end of June 2023
Acceptance on June 29, 2023

lhyxzr 2023-06-27

Excuse me, has there been any change in the submission status? I have submitted my manuscript 12 days ago, and it is still showing as "manuscript submitted" now.

Steve L 2023-06-20

Under normal circumstances, it takes 15 days for the review process.

Ajun-np 2023-06-20

May I ask what happened next? It has been 10 days since the submission, but it is still in the submission status and has not reached the editing stage. I am unsure whether I should send an email to remind them.

Steve L 2023-06-17

Sent for review, not sure how long it will take for repair.

生物材料@Biomaterials 2023-06-15

Direct transfer given. After transferring, it took half a month to wait for editing, but the speed increased once it was in the hands of the editor.

YOIYOI 2023-06-13

Hello, I would like to ask if AFM directly granted the transfer without reviewing it?

生物材料@Biomaterials 2023-06-13

As long as it is submitted for review, the speed is indeed fast. The first trial opinions were received on June 1st, and after revising on June 11th, it went under review on the same day.

Strive! 2023-06-03

6.2 under review finally

Strive! 2023-06-02

6.2 With editor

XiaoMLLL 2023-06-02

6.2 is still submit.

Strive! 2023-05-30

So slow, just submit.

生物材料@Biomaterials 2023-05-23

Translated into English: It was transferred from AFM on April 28th, reached the editor on May 12th, and was only submitted for review yesterday, May 22nd. This speed is a bit slow.

茜茜儿 2023-05-22

How long does it usually take for everyone to get their submissions reviewed? I requested a transfer and was told it would be reviewed, but it has been 12 days since I submitted and it is still in the submission status. It hasn't reached the editor yet. I need it urgently as I am about to graduate. Can I send an email to follow up on this situation?

XiaoMLLL 2023-05-20

AFM made me transfer, will this be easier?

Strive! 2023-05-19

5.19 submit AFM transfer, wishing good luck.

油焖小龙虾 2023-05-14

Almost there, I transferred to AHM for the first trial for two months. Luckily, the second trial is fast, taking only about ten days.

徐小博 2023-05-12

AFM sent for review, after a minor revision it was rejected and then submitted to AHM, requested to respond to AFM's review comments. It was resubmitted on April 4th, it has been over a month now. The status changed to "under review," I am speechless, this journal's speed.

珍珠奶茶烤地瓜 2023-05-11

May I ask what happened to the original poster? I am also considering switching to ahm as an editor, but I am currently hesitant...

油焖小龙虾 2023-05-11

In January, I submitted my paper to AFM and it was reviewed by two reviewers, one positive and one negative. They rejected it and suggested that I submit it to AHM. In an email, they explicitly stated that there was no need for a new peer review and that I should just respond to the comments from the AFM reviewers. They mentioned that AHM would then send the paper back to the original reviewers for a second review. It took me about a month to reply to the comments from both reviewers, and my response was about 6,000 words long. Unfortunately, I was deceived because in February, when I transferred the paper to AHM, I had to find three new reviewers. It took approximately two months for them to provide new feedback. None of the reviewers from AFM had actually read the comments. I was frustrated by this situation. Fortunately, the second review process was relatively quick, and my paper was accepted within 14 days. However, there was a delay of one week due to the need to supplement an agreement regarding experiments. I want to acknowledge that Dr. Flóra Kiss, the Editor, was very prompt in handling the manuscript. She returned it the next day after I sent it back.

qiyedl 2023-04-27

Dr. Flóra Kiss handles manuscripts extremely quickly, with feedback provided in as fast as 50 minutes. The review process for this MS takes approximately two weeks, with three reviewers involved. The above information is for reference only.

Dsivan 2023-04-11

2023.04.11 Under Review

小小小西瓜 2023-04-11

I submitted the manuscript on April 4th.

Dsivan 2023-04-11

2023.04.11 Con Editor

Dsivan 2023-04-10

2023.04.03 Manuscript Submitted
2023.04.10 Manuscript Submitted

cjhom2016 2023-04-06

Excuse me, what happened in the end?

Ajun-np 2023-04-04

"Started to submit to Adv Sci, the editor directly suggested transferring to ADHM, stating that they would send it for peer review (original email: 'We would therefore like to offer you a direct transfer and will be happy to send your paper out for peer review here:'). However, it has been almost two weeks since the transfer, and it is still 'with editor'. Is this journal known for being slow? Is it necessary to send an email to inquire? Will it be helpful?"

2023.03.24 author submit
2023.03.28 with editor
2023.04.04 with editor"