梁建海 2023-05-24

The article I submitted a couple of days ago was rejected during the under review process due to the reason of duplicate submission, as it was found that I had submitted it to another journal. However, that journal had already rejected my submission a month ago. What should I do in this situation?

wishroad 2023-02-14

After receiving the reply, it took three days to finalize the layout and make detailed modifications. The publication will be available online seven days after submission. In the future, I will continue to help master's students submit to this journal and assist them in graduating successfully!

wishroad 2023-02-03

The speed is fast, and thanks to the work of Researcher Hong Li.
First review response within 2 weeks.
Around 15 comments were given, requiring major revisions with a deadline of 20 days.
However, during the revision period, the COVID-19 policies were relaxed, and everyone in the team fell ill.
An additional extension of 10 days for revision was applied and approved.
The submission happened to coincide with the Chinese New Year, with a reply and acceptance received on the first working day after the holiday.
Thank you for recognizing our work, and I wish the journal continuous improvement!

嘉嘉sunshine 2022-07-14

2022.06.09 Submitted
2022.06.11 With Editor
2022.06.16 Under Review
2022.06.30 Major Revision with two reviewers, more than 10 suggestions + additional experiments required
2022.07.10 Resubmitted
2022.07.11 Required Reviews Completed
2022.07.14 Accepted
Thanks to Editor-in-Chief Li Hong and the reviewers for their constructive comments. Best wishes for the continued success of Solid State Ionics.

weizq1971749 2022-01-03

Posted on 2021-07-01
Received first-round review comments on 2021-10-07, after a three-month wait. Two reviewers had a total of seven minor revision comments, and additional experiments were required.
Returned with revisions on 2021-10-22.
Overall, the review comments were a bit slow, possibly because the direction I submitted (sibs) did not align well with the journal's main focus, making it difficult to find reviewers.
Accepted on 2022-01-03, after a total of six months.

weizq1971749 2021-10-24

Post on 2021-07-01
Received first-round review comments on 2021-10-07, after a three-month wait. There were two reviewers and a total of seven minor revisions were suggested, along with the need for additional experiments.
Returned with revised comments on 2021-10-22.
Overall, the review process was a bit slow, possibly due to the mismatch between the topic of my submission (SIBs) and the main focus of the journal, making it difficult to find suitable reviewers.

Tinahhh 2021-07-23

Posted on June 1st, with editor on June 2nd, under review on June 3rd, rejected on June 22nd. Overall, the editor was very prompt and responsible, and the reviewer's comments were constructive. For example, they asked how to determine whether a certain substance is A or B, why the fitting is linear, and what is the fundamental reason for improving electrochemical performance. There were also some language and grammar issues. I have been working on revisions for a month now and have submitted it to another journal. I hope it gets accepted!!! Fingers crossed!