那可不行 2023-07-27

Too slow, it has been three months.

Cheese peper beef 2023-07-12

Did you set up an automatic reply email when you were with the editor? After I made the necessary formatting changes to my article, I gave it directly to the managing editor, who then passed it on to the editor-in-chief. I'm wondering what the situation is. I don't know if the editor-in-chief will demand stricter requirements...

天色青青 2023-07-11

Super fast speed, 3 days with editor, 1 week for review, 2 weeks to receive feedback on the manuscript, 2 revisions. The first revision was given 3 weeks for modification, and the second revision was given 2 weeks for modification. Overall, it felt very smooth with a total duration of 2.5 months. The impact factor increased by 0.2 in 2023, which is excellent. Highly recommended journal!

普罗怕痛 2023-07-10

How long does it take to receive it after the first round of revisions?

行星 2023-07-06

How long has your submitted to journal status lasted?

行星 2023-07-06

How long has your submitted to journal status lasted?

warrior 7 2023-06-30

It took three months, and this is the first article I wrote since entering graduate school. The beginning is not bad! Thank you to my advisor, thank you to the reviewers and editors, let's all keep up the good work!

行星 2023-06-25

It has been several days since submission and it is still being submitted to the journal. I'm very worried: there were many multiple-choice questions during the submission process, and there is a possibility that I may have chosen incorrectly, especially regarding traditional important applications.

warrior 7 2023-05-07

A reliable journal trusted by the Chinese people, awesome!

Zulhumar祖丽 2023-03-28

I want to ask, do you require the specific content and composition test results of the water extraction? Do you require the original data with all marker-labeled protein bands?

Zulhumar祖丽 2023-03-28

Do I need to see the raw data before hiring? Is it necessary for the protein strip original image to have all the marker labeled membranes or is it not required?

Zulhumar祖丽 2023-03-28

Do you need to review the original data before hiring? Should the WB strip image include all marker images, or is it not required?

zyl1994 2023-01-31

One important aspect that this journal aims to accept is that the activity of the substance you study must be relevant to its traditional medicinal uses, and it should be supported by literature, preferably from ancient medical books.

CR9LY 2022-12-14

I have also encountered this issue, and it has been rejected twice. The reasons given were: "The most important criterion for acceptance of a paper to JEP is that the traditional use of the herbal drug (not its constituents) must be closely aligned with the effect studied. This should be substantiated using a clear, verifiable scientific reference. This information should also be included in the abstract under the subheading Ethnopharmacological relevance." I have already made revisions based on recently published articles, but it still wasn't accepted. Should I include the references in the abstract? Is there anyone with experience who can help interpret this?

一只葫芦在此 2022-11-26

Hello, may I ask how to know the specific information about the review process, such as how many people have reviewed it, how many people have been invited, and so on? It has been under review for a month now.

菡玥 2022-11-15

Hello, host, I recently encountered a problem with the traditional usage after submitting my contribution. I would like to ask how you dealt with the issue of traditional usage in the end. I have sent it back three times in this area, and I submitted it again today. I'm not sure if it can be sent for external review.

留级侠 2022-11-14

Do I need to return the first review to the reviewer after it is completed? Previously, it was difficult to find a reviewer for the first review, and no reviewer was willing to accept the invitation. Now it is still "with editor".

tian 2022-10-16

6/10 submission, 9/25 acceptance, one reviewer, minor revisions by the editorial department, major revisions by external review, returned on 9/18, accepted one week later.

mkyk 2022-09-27

Submitted on June 27th, returned one week later for not meeting rule 5.
Resubmitted on July 15th.
Sent for review on August 7th.
Received review comments on August 29th, given one month to make revisions.
Submitted revised manuscript on September 20th, accepted 9 days later.

留级侠 2022-08-22

May I ask how you know the specific review information, such as how many people reviewed it, how many people were invited, and so on?

硫328 2022-07-19

How do I write the outline for the summary required by the host?

ljq2020 2022-07-17

May I ask, which one did you finally choose, OP?

2CZTY 2022-07-14

Which option should I choose?

amanda11 2022-07-11

I have been submitting for two weeks and it still says "Submitted to Journal." Has anyone encountered a situation like mine? After sending an email, they informed me that the preliminary technical review would take 2-3 weeks.

ronghuatan 2022-06-24

May I ask, after returning for repair, what data statement needs to be selected, and which one should be selected below? To complete your submission, you must select a statement that best reflects the availability of your research data/code. Please select a response:
1. No data was used for the research described in the article.
2. The data that has been used is confidential.
3. The authors do not have permission to share data.
4. Data will be made available on request.
5. The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used.
6. Other.

Paper will be accepted 2022-04-12

The review speed is very fast!

ZHUXIANG 2022-04-06

Did you proofread it?

二十不喜欢胡萝卜 2022-03-02

Hello! May I ask if the editorial department has sent you an email to check the status of the review after "under review"?

SUNL 2022-02-22

At that time, I submitted it and it took a month to be reviewed by the editor. However, the result was that it was rejected after only 10 days under review, based on the opinions of two reviewers.

二十不喜欢胡萝卜 2022-02-12

JE Submission: I did not request for a reminder. Around the 10th day after submission, the status changed to "with editor," but two days later, it was directly rejected for not meeting the journal's standards. I then supplemented the data on the mechanism and resubmitted the article. Before it reached the editor-in-chief, the editorial department sent it back four times, mainly due to concerns about the traditional usage. However, each time it was sent back and resubmitted, the processing was quite fast, taking approximately 2-3 days each time. Finally, it is "with editor" again. It has been the 4th day in this "with editor" status, and I don't know if it will be sent for review... In any case, it feels like this journal has many issues and the speed is not fast...