gogogogoing 2023-06-30

Really found out, if a few sentences do not meet the journal's format, they will be rejected.

犀利的橘子 2022-04-20

Hello, I resubmitted after major revisions about a month ago. The current status is "Required Reviews Completed". I would like to know how much longer I need to wait to receive a definite reply. How long did it take for you to receive a response after resubmission? Thank you!

soxbai 2022-02-08

I would like to ask, is the requirement of 3500 words strict? Should it include references and captions for figures?

坚实的蛋壳 2021-07-28

I happened to catch up with the internal transition of the journal with this article, which took a long time. It was submitted on August 4th, 2019 and accepted on May 28th, 2020. During this period, it went through a major revision and was reviewed by two reviewers. One reviewer accepted it directly, while the other, possibly a junior colleague, raised some sharp questions. The editorial department only provided one opportunity for revision, stating that if the modifications were done well, it would be accepted; otherwise, it would be rejected. My advisor felt like giving up, but I really wanted to publish in a top journal like this. Finally, after putting in a lot of effort, it passed. I suggest not only focusing on the impact factor, as this year's impact factor indicates that it may be artificially manipulatable. It's better to consult your advisor or experienced researchers in your field to determine which journals are more recognized.

半城~ 2021-05-31

I am the manuscript rejected by JOB on the 9th floor, but accepted by COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE. Impact factor for 2021 is 5.1. I will never stubbornly submit to this journal again.

半城~ 2021-01-29

Both reviewers agreed to accept the revised manuscript after two months of major revisions. However, a third reviewer rejected it after making a few trivial comments. They claimed that a certain sentence in a paragraph had grammatical issues, along with a few minor problems. The whole process took six months. I am determined and seriously suspect that the opinions of the third reviewer were written by the editor themselves. It is also possible that my skills were not sufficient and I didn't refine it well enough. I have now submitted the article to another journal, and if there is good news, I will come back to comment.