Verified Reviews - IONICS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

dddzzzccc 2023-07-10

May I ask which editor you are?

2023-06-12

2023.3.23 Submission; 2023.3.24 Under review; 2023.5.18 First review comments returned; 2023.5.28 Submission after revision; 2023.6.11 Accepted.

_utcc 2023-06-08

Mine too. There is a link in the corresponding author's email, which provides slightly more detailed information that can be seen.

来福 2023-05-31

I want to know why my status is different from everyone else's. I am peer review.

蜡笔小新 2023-03-29

2023.3.29 Under Review

蜡笔小新 2023-03-28

2023.3.28 Submission: Awaiting Admin Processing

大力出奇迹1111 2023-03-27

Submit on February 3, 2023
Under review approximately two days later
Minor revision on March 12
Submit response on March 21
Accepted on March 27
Thank you, W.W. editor
Zone 4 is also a shooting star! Let's all work hard!

蜡笔小新 2023-01-26

Esperando decisión del EIC 2023.1.26
Awaiting EIC Decision 2023.1.26

蜡笔小新 2023-01-26

Esperando la decisión del EIC 2023.1.26

Awaiting EIC Decision 2023.1.26

logv52 2023-01-16

The amount of published articles is not too large, therefore the editing and reviewing process is fast, with high editing efficiency. The feedback from reviewers is professional and straight to the point. Wishing the journal continuous improvement.
11.12, submission
11.13, under review
12.9, major revision
12.28, submission revision
1.16, accept

蜡笔小新 2022-12-31

2022.12.31 Under Review

hylchl 2022-10-18

8.3 submitted
8.6 under review
8.29 major revision
9.15 revised
10.18 accepted

灰狗 2022-08-08

2022.4.21 submitted
2022.4.26 under review
2022.5.26 major revision
2022.7.8 revised
2022.8.3 accepted

电催化研 2022-07-28

7.4-submit
7.10 minor revise
7.16-revision
7.19 minor revise
7.26 revision
7.27 accept

dscj516 2022-07-03

The review results are out, waiting for the final decision of the editor-in-chief: major revision, minor revision, acceptance.

dscj516 2022-07-03

After submission (or revision), it generally takes about 3 days for the paper to be under review, and within a month, the review comments will be provided. The decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) will be made within a week. Therefore, I estimate that the entire review process takes about 40 days.

The revision period given by the editor is quite long (4 months).

March 20th - Submission
April 14th - Major revision (3-6 questions from two reviewers)
May 7th - Revision (added key experiments and characterization for one month)
June 2nd - Major revision (one acceptance, two questions from another reviewer)
June 4th - Revision (mainly modifying the content of the paper)
July 2nd - Acceptance (had to urge once, but this time the review was really slow!!)

Summary: This is my first work, and my advisor is not very familiar with electrochemistry. A lot of time was wasted during the initial draft revision (2 months before submission). In the end, I submitted the original version. The process was quite challenging. I can only wait for the academic committee in September and make revisions according to the reviewers' comments.

Recommendation: If the advisor is not knowledgeable in a certain field, it is advisable to discuss and make revisions based on one's own understanding. It is better to seek advice from senior students in the field of electrochemistry whom you know.

灰狗 2022-04-27

Today becomes under review.

5adada 2022-04-27

Just said it wrong, this is the chief editor's task. After it's done, it will be reviewed externally.

5adada 2022-04-27

Your review comments are probably back.

灰狗 2022-04-25

Posted on April 21, 2022, the status on the 25th is "awaiting EIC processing." Is this still in the initial review stage at the editorial department?

灰狗 2022-04-25

What does this represent?

5adada 2022-04-14

Posted on February 27th.

5adada 2022-04-14

I didn't check yesterday afternoon, and this morning it changed to "Awaiting EIC Decision". I hope for a positive outcome! Thank you to the editor and reviewers.

Siend 2022-04-05

2022.01.10 Submission
2022.03.05 Minor Revision: One reviewer accepted, one minor revision required.
2022.03.07 Resubmission after proofreading.
2022.04.05 Acceptance
The editing efficiency is very high, the reviewer's comments are very friendly, but the review process is a bit slow.
Hope the journal continues to improve.

5adada 2022-03-30

Hello, may I ask how long it took for you to receive the comments after submitting for review?

5adada 2022-03-30

under review for a month and no results yet.

DH 2022-02-18

2021.11.17 Submitted manuscript
2021.11.20 Under review
2021.12.29 Major Revision
2022.1.22 Submitted revision
2022.1.23 Under review
2022.2.9 Accepted

grt 2022-02-17

I would like to ask if your review comments have come back.

Lxl 2022-02-12

I am a major in Materials Science and Engineering, specializing in battery cathode materials. The first review was done in 17 days, which was very fast. After making major revisions and modifications, the revised manuscript was submitted after two months. It was accepted within a week, showing an overall fast process. The reviewer's questions were relatively professional.

Siend 2022-02-05

2022-01-10 Submission (Review Article)
2022-01-11 EO: Koch, Ilse (Under Review)
It has been almost a month now. Has it already been sent for review or is it still in the initial review by the editorial department?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started