灌水老先生 2021-12-06

Submitted on August 5th, received major revisions on October 5th. The third reviewer suggested one minor revision and two major revisions. Returned on November 5th, made minor revisions on December 2nd. Returned again on December 3rd, accepted on December 5th. The submission consisted of the remaining data from another top-tier article published in the second district, without any overlap between the two articles. The journal was very friendly, and I originally thought it would be rejected. Thank you. Keep up the good work, appreciate the data, conduct experiments, and strive to impact the top-tier district.

Pengpeng 2021-04-22

Reviewed for 5 months, no news~~~

tqy 2021-02-08

2020.10.16 Submission
2021.01.04 Major revision
2021.02.05 Revised
2021.02.07 Accept

The submission was reviewed within three days, followed by a major revision two and a half months later. The opinions of the five reviewers were detailed and their requirements were quite high, resulting in around 70 to 80 suggestions. I made diligent revisions for a month and the acceptance came back quickly. The efficiency was very high. I hope it continues to improve.