majian 2023-08-09

Submitted one month ago and continuously with the editor. Today, there was a sudden decision in process.

Aarion1209 2023-08-05

2023.7.26 major revision and reconsideration
Two reviewers, 1 minor revision (8 minor comments), 1 major revision (4 comments), and the editor provided two suggestions (modify the introduction, elaborate on the discussion); only two weeks were given for revisions.
2023.8.5 resubmit

努力不当菜狗 2023-07-31

So fast, stick, stick, good luck.

MarsD 2023-07-31

submitted to journal 5.27
under review 6.20
major revision for reconsideration 7.12
resubmit 7.17
under review 7.18
minor revision for acceptance 7.25
resubmit 7.27
accept 7.31

bin 2023-07-30

7.29 resubmit
7.29 with editor

苏小胖 2023-07-29

The reviewer has accepted the review, but may not be reviewing the article at the moment, so we have to wait.

努力不当菜狗 2023-07-28

Still with the editor!!! o(╥﹏╥)o Torturous moment.

好吃的菠萝包 2023-07-28

Hello! How do I know if the reviewer accepts the review?

好吃的菠萝包 2023-07-28

My submission has reached the "under review" stage in 20 days. Is this considered fast? However, I have noticed that the status on top has not been updated, so does it mean that the reviewer has not read my article yet?!

苏小胖 2023-07-24

This journal has a one-month consideration period. During this month, please be patient and avoid sending reminder emails. After one month, the editor will consider whether or not to accept the submission. However, the editor is very responsible, and the reviewers are quite professional. Generally, there shouldn't be a problem with innovative submissions.

bin 2023-07-19

2023.7.16 Major revision and reconsideration

Four reviewers, 1 minor revision (4 comments), 2 major revisions (31 comments and 15 comments), 1 rejection (this reviewer believes that besides the new approach, the content of my article lacks innovation and provided 7 comments).

狗憨憨等毕业 2023-07-19

Sent seven reviewers before and after, only one accepted the review. Now there has been no progress for two weeks, and there are no plans to send it to another reviewer again. It can't just be left like this, right?

努力不当菜狗 2023-07-19

I submitted it on July 1st, but it changed twice on the 4th and 6th with the editor. Now it's still with the editor, and I don't know how long it will take to be sent. I feel like they will reject it and give me a DIP in half a month.

行走的巨石 2023-07-18

submitted to journal 2023.2.11
with editor 2023.2.27,2023.3.2 - The dates changed twice, it seems that the editor reviewed it in between.
under review 2023.3.6
major revision for reconsideration 2023.5.2 - Two reviewers, one of them was very slow. They gave two weeks for revisions. This journal requires major revisions for reconsideration, so don't worry, just make the necessary changes.
submitted to journal 2023.5.11
under review 2023.5.16 - I asked customer service and they said only one reviewer completed the review, the other one disappeared.
Decision in Process 2023.6.16
accept 2023.7.14 - The editor reviewed it on behalf of the other reviewer and accepted it after the review.

unluckyJJ 2023-07-18

I submitted it at the end of November last year, and the second review is still not completed. The reviewers are not responding at all, and I don't know why.

bin 2023-07-13

According to the number of articles published on Web of Science this year, the publication volume of food chemistry is rapidly decreasing. It is estimated that the number of publications this year has decreased by more than 30% compared to last year. It already decreased by 20% last year, and it continues to decrease this year. My article has been stuck in "required reviews completed" for over a month, feeling like a sacrificial offering.

科研顺利-accept 2023-07-12

Did you not research the characteristics of FC before your first investment? It is normal for an editor to take one month.

kaqho 2023-07-12

It should be able to be reviewed, and with an editor, it takes about 10 days.

努力不当菜狗 2023-07-12

7.1投 (7.1 submission)
7.4 with editor
7.6 with editor
The current status is still with editor and has not changed.
What's the situation, guys?
It's my first time submitting to FC, I hope it won't be rejected.

zhangdlpu 2023-07-11

Hello, OP! On 4.19, two reviewers were assigned to review the manuscript. On 5.2, the first reviewer's comments were submitted, and on 5.9, the second reviewer's comments were submitted. Where can I find the status of whether the reviewers have accepted or returned their comments? Thank you!

dongdong520 2023-07-09

May I ask if we have received a review and can view the content of the reviewer?

Aarion1209 2023-07-06

Why do you keep reminding that the comments are inappropriate? Can't send the English translation of "track peer review status"?
Review completed: 1;
Accepted for review: 2+;
Invited for review: 2+

Aarion1209 2023-07-06

June 19th, Under Review

LabXu 2023-07-05

June 22nd, submission
June 27th, under review
June 27th, the first reviewer accepted the review
June 29th, the second reviewer accepted the review
July 5th, currently still under review.
Wishing good luck.

乱七八糟一大堆 2023-06-30

3.13 submit.
3.28 with editor
4.3 under review
5.1 major revision
5.10 submit
5.12 under review
6.11 major revision First reviewer agrees to accept, second reviewer submits the same comments, feeling numb
6.12 response Color annotation submitted
6.13 under review
6.24 rrc Found a new reviewer
6.26 minor revision Not important, made casual changes and submitted directly, need to praise the editor here, reviewer wanted to reference his own article but the editor deleted it
6.26 with editor
6.28 minor revision Reviewer's comments are blank, sent an email to inquire, editor forgot to include comments, really numb
6.29 submit
6.30 accept
The process was tortuous and agonizing, but still have to give a shoutout to FC. The editor handled it really quickly!
Often wake up early in the morning and check the track, so I'm really happy at this moment~
Hope everyone can have their own TOP~

科研顺利-accept 2023-06-30

The situation you are facing is actually a divergence of opinions between the reviewers. The editor finds it difficult to make a decision, so they have decided to invite new reviewers to continue the evaluation process.

念N 2023-06-29

The text is already in English. It says "with editor 0629" and "accept 0629".

wyz 227425 2023-06-29

6.25 required reviewers completed
6.26 under review
required reviewers completed
This status and under review have been repeated twice, making people confused.

念N 2023-06-29

rrc 0623
minor revision for acceptance 0625

Translation: The document with the reference number RRC 0623 requires a minor revision in order to be accepted. The revised version should be submitted by 0625.

bin 2023-06-27

The required reviews were completed on 6.12. Until today (6.27), there have been no results. Checking the track website, I saw that there were four reviewers. Based on the time of accepting the review and the completion time, I speculate that two reviewers are from the United States and two from China. I have already graduated, so it may be difficult to make up for the experiment. What a pity.