Verified Reviews - Defence Technology
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

多多中SCI!!! 2023-08-04

Finally, after ten months of waiting, I have been hired. I am grateful, so grateful. It seems that the journal requires at least two reviewers, and most of my time was spent on finding reviewers.

Nixi 2023-08-01

May I ask if the status "decision in process" appears directly after the first round of "under review," or is it "major"?

Nixi 2023-08-01

Did you receive the status "decision in process" after the first round of review, or did it go straight to "major revision"?

Nixi 2023-08-01

Did you receive a "decision in process" status in the first round of review or did it directly show "major revision"?

EliXu 2023-07-26

2023.04.04 Submit and send non-confidential certification.

EliXu 2023-07-26

2023.04.04 and send for confidentiality review
2023.04.05 with editor
2023.04.05 Under review
2023.06.11 Major revision given two weeks, actually not many issues, added a test
2023.06.26 Revision submit
2023.06.27 Under review
2023.07.17 Decision in process
2023.07.26 Accept

lxhxy 2023-07-23

Is defence technology charging fees now?

小石头 2023-07-12

I didn't pay the layout fee at that time, I don't know if it is needed now.

Gxg123 2023-06-20

Hello, how is the status of your article now? Have you submitted the confidential documents?

星踪 2023-06-17

2023.6.8 Submitted to Journal
It has been a week already and I am still in this state. I haven't received any email reminding me to submit the non-confidential proof materials, and I don't know where to submit them either.
Does anyone know what to do in this situation?

齐达内爱飘柔 2023-06-16

May I ask how much is the layout fee for this journal?

MONKEY 2023-06-11

Hello, may I ask how long it takes from being hired to being published and retrieved?

是执着久了 2023-05-31

accept (verb) - to agree to receive or take something offered or given; to admit or believe something to be true

Examples:

1. I gladly accept your invitation to the party.
2. The university has accepted her application for admission.
3. He couldn't accept the fact that he had failed the exam.
4. She accepted the gift with a smile.
5. The company accepts payments through various methods, including credit cards and bank transfers.

是执着久了 2023-05-11

5.11 decision in process translated into English is "Decision in process on November 5th."

多多中SCI!!! 2023-05-03

First trial takes three months, second trial takes three months. The key is just one reviewer, who is already dead inside. Recently, they have also started charging page fees, 750 per page...

hunnzi 2023-04-19

Submitted on December 5th, in the 22nd year. Major revisions will take about a month, and the rework comments should be completed within two weeks. Minor revisions will take about another month, and the rework comments should be written within two weeks. After the minor revisions, it will take approximately one week to receive feedback. Finally, the acceptance will be completed on April 12th.

是执着久了 2023-04-19

4.12 Revised under review.

是执着久了 2023-04-04

2023.4.4 Major

是执着久了 2023-03-23

2023.3.13 under review

小石头 2023-01-28

First submission, the review process was fast and the expert opinions were also appropriate. The timeline is as follows:
2022.11.05 Submitted to Journal
2022.11.07 Email sent with non-confidentiality certificate to Editor
2022.11.08 Under Review
2022.11.28 Major Revision
2022.12.11 Revision Submitted to Journal
2022.12.12 Under Review after being with Editor
2023.01.03 Decision in Process
2023.01.18 Accept

VvvvV66 2023-01-19

Good journal, friendly to Chinese people.

YUWEN JUN 2022-12-06

5.12 submitted
5.13 Confidentiality Statement Submitted
5.14 under review
5.30 major revision
6.2x revised
6.2x under review Original Reviewer
7.25 accept
A rigorous and reliable journal, all four reviewers provided valuable suggestions, ensuring better quality of the article. Thank you to the editor for the meticulous editing and formatting, ensuring the quality and scientific validity of the journal article. A very good domestic SCI journal, the initial review was fast, peers in related fields can give it a try.

月亮 2022-11-30

We have basically blocked this. Domestic journals have an international version or follow the same procedures as domestic ones. The key issue is that there is no proper peer review process at all, it is simply a waste of time. I have submitted a few times and received arbitrary reasons, but it's mainly because of language issues. It seems like they didn't even read it. I have had success with International Journal of Industrial Engineering, so I don't need to pursue higher-level journals like this. I have already blocked it and won't submit anymore. Many people I know also don't submit to it anymore. It's quite disgusting, to be honest. Making a phone call or using personal connections is enough to get published in domestic journals.

华章 2022-11-22

I can't find any articles of this journal in the SCI database. Is there something wrong with my retrieval method, or is the SCI retrieval speed just really slow?

长江后浪 2022-10-31

The text "投稿当日杯具" translates to "Cup on the day of submission" in English.

The second sentence "不拖沓,赞" translates to "Not procrastinating, praise" in English.

哈哈哈哈 2022-10-22

If you don't have any connections within the country, then don't bother applying. They heavily consider your school and background. Both of my articles were rejected for various ridiculous reasons, and then they were accepted by two other CCF-B journals.

duxiaoxi1993 2022-10-08

On the day of submission, the editor sent an email urging for the non-confidential proof. They mentioned that once they receive the non-confidential proof, they will send it for review as soon as possible. After submitting the non-confidential proof, it was rejected the next day by the editor, stating that the language was not acceptable and the proof regarding the engineering background in Russia was not sufficient.

韩大大 2022-06-17

3.8 Submission
4.29: Major revision
5.11: Revised, under review on the same day
6.2: Decision in process
6.15: Accepted
There were a total of three reviewers, with two of them providing 9 comments each. One of the reviewers questioned the formulas used in the paper, asking deep questions. Another reviewer expressed high approval of the article, only raising one question and suggesting more references to be cited from American and Russian classic literature. The first review process was relatively fast, taking about 6 weeks. After the major revisions were submitted, it took one month for the reviewer to review and then the paper was with the editor for half a month. Overall, it was satisfactory.

DRM 2022-06-16

Does "Decision in Process" last for more than 10 days?

梦涛 2022-06-15

The translation of the text into English is as follows: "The speed is very fast.
Submitted on March 1, 22.
First review feedback received on April 1, 22: Major revisions required.
Returned with modifications on April 15, 22.
Second review feedback received on May 30, 22: Accepted.
Article entered the publication process on June 2, 22.
Online pre-release on June 7, 22.
Completed online proof on June 10.
Currently still waiting for updates from the publishing house."

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started