wind@ 2023-07-22

I got two papers accepted, both of which were submitted from the field of chemistry. There was no information for ten days before the submission deadline. The editor sent them for anonymous and expedited peer review, and provided a review comment after considering that the papers met the requirements. I was asked to make revisions and resubmit. The second round of submission went smoothly, and the quality of the reviewers was very high. I am looking forward to further improvements. However, personally, I feel that it is getting more and more difficult.

SURPERME 2023-07-20

May I ask what the process is like? I just submitted my manuscript, how long does it usually take for it to be reviewed?

toapologise 2023-07-14

I am still a novice in scientific research. May I ask what does SC journal mean?

111% 2023-07-05

The Chinese Association for Science and Science jointly publishes a journal, aiming to be on par with Nature and Science (although the slogan is a bit ambitious). However, it is indeed quite difficult. It is required to have an impact on multiple fields, and the review process is quite fair (the author's information and affiliation are hidden, and the papers are scored by 3-4 editors before being sent for review). This is much better than National Science Review and Science Bulletin. This mechanism determines that its prospects will definitely surpass the two journals mentioned earlier!

不下雨的云 2023-06-27

Remember that the submission email had a similar message. I looked back and it said, "The quality of articles to be accepted in our journal is not lower than that of Science Advances (IF=13.1). The results should have an impact on multiple areas." It seems like they are referring to the quality, not directly comparing impact factors.

penguin 2023-06-23

Does this count as a slap in the face now?

astroaunt 2023-06-09

The status of the paper submission changed to "under review" after one week, and after one month, the comments were returned.
The reviewers were very professional and raised questions that were very relevant.
After ten days of revising, it changed to "accept".

我爱吃芒果z 2023-05-18

It has been 10 days, and there is still no manuscript number. I don't know what the situation is, as it has been in a submitted state all along.

一往无前。。 2023-05-07

After being rejected by SC, I followed my boss's suggestion and submitted to this journal. The review process was very fast, and the feedback was very professional. Overall, it felt great, and I hope that Research will continue to develop better in the future.

shades7773 2023-04-27

The status has been "manuscript submitted" for 9 days already. Is this normal?

隐风1 2023-04-12

Posted on February 24th, minor revision on March 23rd, rework on April 3rd, accepted on April 12th, the speed is still relatively fast.

方夏 2023-04-12

We need some novelty and a large amount of data. The editors are also responsible and serious. The submission deadline is on February 7th, and the acceptance notification will be sent on April 12th. After the editors review the manuscript, they will remove all author names and send it to the pre-reviewers. Only if 2-3 pre-review experts consider it suitable for external review, it will be sent for external review. Then, the opinions and comments of 2-5 external review experts will be considered.

方夏 2023-04-06

Hello, is your still Under Review?

岁月 2023-03-18

Can you please explain the situation? It has been 50 days since the return of the major repairs, and it is still under review.

chli 2023-03-13

Same question, the status of the article in the system has always been "Manuscript submitted", I don't know how many days it will take to be assigned to an editor.

kit—letpub 2023-02-17

It seems that an ID will only be available after a decision is made for submission.

轻舟已过万重山 2023-02-17

Is that so, classmate?

cjhom2016 2023-01-23

How long did you wait for your proof to receive the email?

cjhom2016 2023-01-23

How long did you wait for your proof?

不下雨的云 2022-11-17

The efficiency of this journal is acceptable. There is a pre-review stage where author information is removed and evaluated by members of the editorial board. The reviewers' questions are quite professional, and they also provide two suggestions for additional representation, one of which is indeed effective. After submission, not all authors need to confirm, but there should be a signed confirmation document from all authors before final acceptance and publication. Good luck to everyone, and I hope the journal continues to improve!

Rob小欣 2022-11-17

Hello, just submitted. I would like to ask the same question, is it necessary for all authors to confirm before proceeding to the next step?

十克拉 2022-11-15

Give up the sub-journal and directly submit to the Research journal. The paper's authors are not prominent figures, but the journal is still relatively fair. Recommended!!!

小qu 2022-10-10

After I confirm the submission here, I cannot see it in the submission system. Can the contributing author see the submission details and progress?

小qu 2022-10-10

Can the contributing author see the submission information and progress? After I confirmed the submission, I cannot see it in the submission system.

小qu 2022-10-10

Can the contributing author see the submission information and progress?

梅子黄时Rain 2022-08-09

May I ask, what does it mean when it says "Manuscript Submitted" after submission? All authors have already confirmed, but the status has not changed, and the manuscript number is also empty. It has been over a week.

梅子黄时Rain 2022-08-09

May I ask, what does "Manuscript Submitted" mean after submission? All authors have already confirmed it, but the status has not been changed and the manuscript number is also empty. It has been over a week.

Leve 2022-07-08

The strong alliance between the China Association for Science and Technology and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, benchmarking against the National Science Foundation, has a high starting point. The editorial board is composed of a team of academicians, and the future development is promising. The chief editor's efficiency is very high! Thanks to the chief editor and the five reviewers for their opinions, which have been of great help. After more than two months of acceptance, the depth of the article has been further improved. Just received the first impact factor. Wishing Research to continue to thrive!

WMark 2022-07-06

How long is the general review period? I have submitted it over a month ago and there has been no response yet.

pandaaa 2022-07-02

This journal should be good, but the few partner journals provided by S family seem a bit perfunctory. They don't even have proper issue numbers, all the papers belong to one volume 2022??? How can we track specific articles regularly, flipping through from beginning to end every time? Speechless, hope for improvement in the future!