阿瓦山寨 2023-07-26

Will soon be removed from SCI.

VVIP 2023-05-12

The article was submitted for about a year before finally being accepted before graduation. The overall speed was quite fast, as it was submitted in mid-March and received the acceptance email in the evening of May 11th. The external review process was also relatively quick, with two rounds of revisions. The second round only took two days to receive the results. Thumbs up, and I hope the journal continues to improve. I also wish everyone success in their research journey. Keep up the good work!

luyuan1994 2023-03-31

No, last year I published an article in December and it was searchable on WOS in January.

哈哈1994 2023-02-28

Does it really take 2 years for this journal to be indexed? That's way too long.

了-1 2023-02-14

How can I view the Volume and Issue of this journal based on DOI?

化工蔡老师 2023-02-14

I thought this journal should have been upgraded to a Tier 2 in the field of engineering materials, but unexpectedly it became a Tier 4. This work was written when I graduated from graduate school, and the results were good but the design was not rigorous. I submitted it to two Tier 1 institutes of the Chinese Academy of Sciences without review, and both were tragic in terms of peer review. Later, I thought it was suitable for a Tier 2 journal where I usually submit manuscripts, but it turned out to be tragic after peer review. I was annoyed and said I didn't want the article anymore because I don't lack Tier 3 or Tier 4 papers, but after thinking about it, since I had already written it, it would be a waste to throw it away (many professors still don't have papers). It was left in the computer for half a year and submitted to a journal after the Chinese New Year (I had published a paper in 2019).

20230102---Submitted to journal
20230110----With editor
20230111----Under review
20230208----Minor revision (The reviewers were very friendly, especially the second foreigner's opinion: "Very good paper, I am pleased with how comprehensive this paper is.")---I initially positioned it as a Tier 1, and I thought it could be a Tier 2, but after experiencing multiple tragedies, I gave up.

20230209---Submitted to Journal
20230213---With editor
20230214---Accepted

番茄理论 2023-02-09

May I ask how long it takes to publish after acceptance? I noticed that the online version is quite fast, but the distribution of printed issues is delayed by over a year?

Fater 2022-12-20

Hello, how long does it usually take for you to receive the proof email after submitting your article? It has been a month for me and I haven't received any relevant email.

snow! 2022-12-12

Can I ask everyone how to operate this after receiving it? I emailed the boss, can't we choose not to open source it? Help the child. The boss is broke.

Fater 2022-12-10

May I ask, how long will it take for your article to be proofread after it is submitted?

梨花梨花 2022-10-11

Have you published it? How long did it take?

梨花梨花 2022-09-08

Excuse me, do you have the enw file for the reference format of this journal? I kindly request you to share it.

snow! 2022-09-01

My application has been under review for almost a month now, and it is still under review. The date has become the 29th, but the status remains "under review."

梨花梨花 2022-08-31

May I ask how long it took to review?

oyx0519 2022-08-31

After the first revision, I asked the following question: "Please can you upload a clean version of the manuscript? If you wish to include a version of your manuscript file showing tracked changes/highlights, please upload this additionally as a Supplementary material." Following this request, I added an extra clean version (a manuscript without any highlighted font colors) and separately uploaded a highlights file. After the second return, the question asked was: "Please upload the manuscript with highlights/tracked changes as supplementary material." How can this be resolved?

oyx0519 2022-08-31

After the first revision, I asked the following question: "Please can you upload a clean version of the manuscript? If you wish to include a version of your manuscript file showing tracked changes/highlights, please upload this additionally as Supplementary material." Based on this request, I added an extra clean version (a manuscript without marked font colors) and separately uploaded a highlights file. After the second return, the question was raised again: "Please upload the manuscript with highlights/tracked changes as supplementary material." How can this be resolved?

夏迎春 2022-08-02

I don't know, it's all up to the boss to handle. (How do I reply individually? ??)

Bales 2022-07-31

Hello, may I ask if you have received the email for the transfer of rights after receiving it? It has been almost half a month and I still have not received any relevant emails. I don't know what's going on.

夏迎春 2022-07-30

2022.05.24 submit to journal
2022.07.01 major revision (6 reviewers)
2022.07.05 revision submit to journal
2022.07.29 accepted
Thanks to editor Martin Kaltschmitt, hoping for continuous improvement in biomass conversion and biorefinery! Let's go for it!

一只放养的羊 2022-07-12

2022.05.01 submit to journal
2022.05.04 with editor
2022.05.05 under reviewer
2022.06.06 major revision
2022.06.30 revision submit to journal
2022.07.12 accepted
Two reviewers, one major revision and one minor revision, the editor provided the major revision. Thank you to Martin Kaltschmitt for editing. I hope Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery will continue to improve, let's go!

Lj20131209 2022-06-10

First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Martin Kaltschmitt for his fast editing process. I submitted the manuscript on March 24th, and it was accepted on May 19th. The three reviewers raised very professional questions, but they were not difficult to answer. They also corrected some errors in the manuscript.

Anaerobe 2022-05-03

20220210 submit to journal
20220220 under reviewer
20220321 major revision
20220402 Revision submit to journal
20220407 with editor
20220408 under reviewer
20220415 Required Reviews Completed
20220417 Required Reviews Completed
20220419 Minor revision
20220422 submit to journal
20220422 with editor
20220423 accepted
Overall, it went smoothly. Surprisingly, we had 5 reviewers in the initial review, but fortunately, none of them rejected the submission. After major revisions, we made some minor adjustments. The reviewers' comments were constructive and responsible.

jiejing 2021-12-01

Just send an email to remind them. The repair has been waited for more than ten days, while the initial investment has been waited for more than twenty days.

jiq 2021-11-30

Hello, has the system issue been resolved? I have been waiting for a few days.

luyuan1994 2021-11-29

2021.09.10 Submission
2021.09.19 Under Review
2021.10.15 Major Revision
2021.11.08 Revised
2021.11.23 With Editor
2021.11.24 Under Review
2021.11.29 Accept
The reviewer's comments were not difficult, and I had completed the revisions around October 25th. However, I was afraid that the reviewer would think I made the modifications too quickly and not seriously, so I only submitted it on the 8th. After submission, there were technical issues with the journal server, so it didn't reach the editor until around the 23rd. In the end, the second review was accepted, and the overall speed was still fast. If I hadn't procrastinated and there were no server issues, I would have finished it in about two months. Finally, I wish everyone's articles to be accepted by their desired journals.

jiejing 2021-11-25

Recent slow reviewers can send an email to remind them, and both articles will be assigned to editors after being reminded. Today, when logging into the submission page, it says that there is a problem with the system. "Please note that Aries is aware that users may encounter intermittent slowness issues while working in EM/PM. The Aries team is working hard to identify the root cause and implement a fix. They are addressing this issue with the highest priority and apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused you."

wswdly445 2021-11-23

8.31 Submission
10.20 First review, major revisions, three reviewers
11.5 Revision
11.23 Acceptance
It is considered supplementary data, but the reviewers' comments were very sharp and insightful. After making the changes, the article has been elevated to a higher level. Overall, it has been relatively smooth, and I hope for even smoother progress in the future!

luyuan1994 2021-11-21

I have sent you my contact information privately. We can communicate with each other.

wswdly445 2021-11-21

No... It hasn't reached the editor's hands yet. What's going on?

luyuan1994 2021-11-21

Upstairs classmates, have you dealt with your revised manuscripts?