Verified Reviews - Food Packaging and Shelf Life
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Roseyman 2023-08-01

The second article has just been received for a week. The editor is very responsible, but some external reviewers are slow in their pace. On average, it takes 14 days for revisions. The editorial department will urge for revisions after one week and continue to follow up after two days. The timing of the review process is carefully observed. The review process for the first article took more than four months (with some minor incidents), while the second article took three months. Overall, it feels like it takes about 3-4 months to go online! It's a top-tier publication, and a big thumbs up is a must.

SIT拖拉机 2023-06-15

I sincerely advise everyone not to submit to this journal. The review process can take up to six months at its fastest, and there is a high likelihood of rejection. I have encountered the slowest and most hesitant journal.

随便投期刊了 2023-05-04

Congratulations, basking in joy.

Blaise 2023-05-04

Now it has been received, overall it's okay, just too slow. There are two reviewers in total, and no one is being difficult.

随便投期刊了 2023-04-27

Is there any news? How many reviewers are there for the first review?

Blaise 2023-04-19

22.10.28 submitted
22.12.15 under review
23.2.18 returned for revision
23.2.28 revised
23.4.19 still under review
It is really slow!

夜未染 2023-04-10

It's almost a week.

随便投期刊了 2023-03-29

May I ask how long does it take to submit for review after "with editor"?

果怡宝 2023-03-24

Did it take more than a month for your article to go from "with editor" to "under review" status? In other words, did it take more than a month to submit for review?

果怡宝 2023-03-19

2023.3.15 submitted to journal - This means that something (probably a document or article) was submitted to a journal on March 15, 2023.

2023.3.18 with editor - This implies that on March 18, 2023, the submitted document or article was received by the editor of the journal.

No Cap 2023-03-18

May I ask how long it has been under review?

科研民工白 2023-03-18

2023.2.2 - Submitted to journal
2023.2.13 - With editor
2023.3.18 - Under review

夜未染 2023-03-16

2022.12.03 submit - Submitted on December 3, 2022.
2022.12.12 with editor - Under review with editor on December 12, 2022.
2023.02.09 major revision - Major revision required on February 9, 2023.
2023.02.24 with editor - Under review with editor on February 24, 2023.
2023.03.16 accepted - Accepted on March 16, 2023.

There was a long gap due to Western Christmas and New Year holidays, and the first review took a relatively long time. The reviewer provided nearly twenty comments, and the editor requested a major revision, including an additional experiment. It took more than three months of continuous work, but finally, the paper was accepted. Moreover, it has been upgraded to a higher tier this year. I hope FPSL (presumably a journal or conference) continues to thrive.

科研民工白 2023-02-28

2023.2.2 Submit to journal - This means that on February 2, 2023, a submission was made to a journal.

2023.2.13 with editor - This means that on February 13, 2023, the submission was reviewed by an editor.

Blaise 2022-12-22

Now it has been submitted for review, hoping for a good outcome.

M0107 2022-12-21

May I ask, has the status of the article changed? [Wishing for an accepted post]

M0107 2022-12-21

Excuse me, has the status of your article changed? [Wishing for an acceptance post]

雪橇狗的咆哮 2022-12-14

A very good journal, after I submitted my manuscript, it was sent for review within a week. Although the first review took ten months, and then it was rejected, they still apologized after the rejection.

会飞的实验室 2022-12-12

Did you submit the current situation for review?

会飞的实验室 2022-12-11

2022.12.11 Con Editor

Blaise 2022-12-10

10.24 Submission
11.24 with Editor
Still with Editor until now
The progress is really slow, don't know what is taking so long.

会飞的实验室 2022-12-05

Starting from November 23, 2022, the submission to the editorial department is still in progress, it's really slow.

Fuliner 2022-10-24

First submission, there are major issues with the content format, directly rejected.

努力小柯基qq 2022-08-16

2022.4.12 submitted
2022.6.11 major revision
2022.6.20 revised
2022.8.16 accepted.
Took 4 months, which is relatively fast.

Alix 2022-06-29

I have already hired, and now the impact factor is over 8.

180 2022-05-19

My work has been in the editor's hands for a month too. It hasn't been sent out yet. Should I wait a little longer or remind him? It's so agonizing.

180 2022-05-19

OP, has your article been accepted? My article has been in the hands of the editor for a month, and it hasn't been sent out yet. Should I remind them, or should I wait a little longer? It's agonizing.

180 2022-05-19

I also submitted to the journal and waited for about 17 days for the editor to receive it. It has been a month now, and it has not been sent for review yet. It is still with the editor. Should I remind them?

180 2022-05-19

Hello, how are you doing now? I also submitted my paper to the journal about 17 days ago, and it has been with the editor for a month now without being sent for review. Should I remind them?

皮卡小白 2022-04-23

I have known for a long time that this journal is slow, but I didn't expect it to be this slow... It has been 13 days since submission and it is still in the "submit" status... Are other friends experiencing the same thing?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More