ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
ENG FRACT MECH
ISSN / eISSN
0013-7944
Aims and Scope
EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
Subject Area
MECHANICS
CiteScore
8.70
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Engineering - Mechanical Engineering | Q1 | #74/672 |
Engineering - Mechanics of Materials | Q1 | #53/398 |
Engineering - General Materials Science | Q1 | #86/463 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
MECHANICS | Q1 |
H-index
106
Country/Area of Publication
ENGLAND
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Publication Frequency
Semimonthly
Year Publication Started
1968
Annual Article Volume
624
Open Access
NO
Contact
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Verified Reviews
Initial Date Submitted: Dec 25, 2021
Under Review: Jan 28, 2022
Major Revision: Mar 15, 2022
There were a total of four reviewers, two minor revisions, one major revision, and one rejection. We were given two months to make revisions. The reviewers' comments were very professional, and they carefully reviewed the derivation of some mathematical formulas. They provided many constructive suggestions for improvement, which were helpful in enhancing the quality of the article (even from the reviewer who gave the rejection).
In early May, we submitted the revised version. The reviewer who requested the major revision agreed to publish, and the reviewer who requested the minor revision asked us to add some discussions.
After submitting in early June, the editor agreed to accept and publish.
Overall impression: The editor's processing time was a bit long, but they had good control over the modifications made to the article (such as which reviewers to send the revised manuscript to). Most of the reviewers' comments were professional, making it worth submitting!
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now