Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism

A SIMULATION OF DISAGREEMENT FOR CONTROL OF RATIONAL CHEATING IN PEER REVIEW

(2013) FRANCISCO GRIMALDO et al.   ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS

Scientific peer review

(2013) Lutz Bornmann   ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

On peer review in computer science: analysis of its effectiveness and suggestions for improvement

(2013) Azzurra Ragone et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Towards a living earth simulator

(2012) M. Paolucci et al.   European Physical Journal-Special Topics

A better alternative to the h index

(2012) Lutz Bornmann   Journal of Informetrics

Psychology must learn a lesson from fraud case

(2011) Jelte M. Wicherts   NATURE

The paper is not sacred

(2011) Adam Marcus et al.   NATURE

Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding

(2011) Paul J. Roebber et al.   PLoS One

A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures

(2009) Johan Bollen et al.   PLoS One

Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate

(2009) David M. Schultz   SCIENTOMETRICS

Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication

(2008) Lutz Bornmann et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS