Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?

Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data

(2017) Flaminio Squazzoni et al.   NATURE

Peer review: Troubled from the start

(2016) Alex Csiszar   NATURE

The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise

(2016) Michail Kovanis et al.   PLoS One

Editorial behaviors in peer review

(2016) Wei Wang et al.   SpringerPlus

Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism

(2014) Mario Paolucci et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

A SIMULATION OF DISAGREEMENT FOR CONTROL OF RATIONAL CHEATING IN PEER REVIEW

(2013) FRANCISCO GRIMALDO et al.   ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS

Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers

(2012) Adrian Mulligan et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Bias in peer review

(2012) Carole J. Lee et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure

(2012) Flaminio Squazzoni et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average

(2011) S. Thurner et al.   EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B

Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding

(2011) Paul J. Roebber et al.   PLoS One

Positive assortment for peer review

(2010) C Athena Aktipis et al.   ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR