INDUSTRIAL LUBRICATION AND TRIBOLOGY

期刊名
INDUSTRIAL LUBRICATION AND TRIBOLOGY

IND LUBR TRIBOL

ISSN / eISSN
0036-8792 / 0036-8792
目标和范围
Industrial Lubrication and Tribology provides a broad coverage of the materials and techniques employed in tribology. It contains a firm technical news element which brings together and promotes best practice in the three disciplines of tribology, which comprise lubrication, wear and friction. ILT also follows the progress of research into advanced lubricants, bearings, seals, gears and related machinery parts, as well as materials selection. A double-blind peer review process involving the editor and other subject experts ensures the content's validity and relevance.
研究方向

工程:机械

CiteScore
2.90 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Engineering - Mechanical Engineering Q2 #301/631
Engineering - General Energy Q2 #36/71
Engineering - Surfaces, Coatings and Films Q3 #77/131
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL - SCIE Q4
H-index
24
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
出版周期
Bimonthly
年文章数
135
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED, HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY, ENGLAND, W YORKSHIRE, BD16 1WA
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
I have previously submitted an article, and the requirement was for it to be concise, innovative, and to the point. I submitted again a few months later, and after one month, it came back for major revisions. After making the modifications and resubmitting it after a week, I received a notification after twenty days stating "waiting for editor's decision," but the next day it changed back to "under review." From my perspective, it seems that the editor is not satisfied with my article, but most of the reviewers' comments are positive. Could it be that the editor wants to reject it by finding a reviewer who agrees with them? Sigh.
2021-09-09
Forgot to update, it's very fast. The first piece was rejected and took one month, but the second piece was returned for revision for one month and accepted the following month. In my personal opinion, for this publication, the logical coherence must be very consistent, with no issues as long as there is innovation, fluency, and clarity.
2023-07-18

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now