期刊名
Frontiers in Nutrition

FRONT NUTR

ISSN / eISSN
2296-861X / 2296-861X
目标和范围
No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health.

Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
研究方向

营养学

CiteScore
3.50 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Food Science Q2 #161/359
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Nutrition and Dietetics Q3 #73/131
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Q3 #137/232
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
NUTRITION & DIETETICS - SCIE Q2
出版国家或地区
SWITZERLAND
出版商
Frontiers Media S.A.
年文章数
3145
Open Access
YES
通讯方式
AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, CH-1015
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
1. Posted on December 1st; Interactive review opened on March 2nd; Only Reviewer 1 provided comments when it was opened on March 2nd. It took two weeks to reply to Reviewer 1, addressing very detailed issues including grammar problems in writing and some research mechanism aspects.
2. On March 19th, Reviewer 2 submitted comments regarding some statistical methods issues. It took one week for major revisions.
3. On March 20th, Reviewer 3 submitted comments with a lower score but addressing some issues related to the research design itself.
After one round of revisions, all reviewers agreed to accept the paper. The editor was very fast in their work, constantly urging for the manuscript and was very responsible. Acceptance was received on April 5th.
2023-04-06
After submission, the first month had one reviewer who provided feedback. I continued to wait for responses from other reviewers. In the meantime, the journal asked me to recommend reviewers, and I did. After three months passed without finding a reviewer, they rejected my submission, claiming it did not meet the requirements. It's truly absurd that they couldn't find a reviewer for such a long time and instead claimed my article didn't meet the submission requirements. They should have stated that it didn't meet the requirements from the beginning. They wasted four months of my time, which is very irresponsible. I advise being cautious when submitting articles.
2023-07-06

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started