4.4 Article

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of infections: a population-based study

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages 854-858

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.054015

Keywords

monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; infections; multiple myeloma; bacteria; virus

Categories

Funding

  1. Stockholm County Council
  2. Karolinska Institutet
  3. Cancer Society in Stockholm
  4. NIH, NCI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

No comprehensive evaluation has been made to assess the risk of viral and bacterial infections among patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Using population-based data from Sweden, we estimated risk of infections among 5,326 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients compared to 20,161 matched controls. Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance had a 2-fold increased risk (P < 0.05) of developing any infection at 5- and 10-year follow up. More specifically, patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance had an increased risk (P < 0.05) of bacterial (pneumonia, osteomyelitis, septicemia, pyelonephritis, cellulitis, endocarditis, and meningitis), and viral (influenza and herpes zoster) infections. Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance with M-protein concentrations over 2.5 g/dL at diagnosis had highest risks of infections. However, the risk was also increased (P < 0.05) among those with concentrations below 0.5 g/dL. Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance who developed infections had no excess risk of developing multiple myeloma, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia or related malignancy. Our findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms behind infections in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias, and may have clinical implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available