4.4 Article

5-azacitidine prolongs overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 303-310

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.010611

Keywords

myelodysplastic syndrome; hypomethylating agents; 5-azacitidine; decitabine

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypomethylating agents have recently been shown to improve the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. A meta-analysis and systematic review was carried out of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment with hypomethylating agents to conventional care, i.e., best supportive care or chemotherapy, in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. The outcomes assessed were overall survival, time to transformation or death, overall response rate and toxicity. Hazard ratios with 95%, confidence intervals were estimated and pooled for time-to-event data. For dichotomous data, relative risks were estimated and pooled. Four trials including 952 patients examined the effect of 5-azacitidine and decitabine. Treatment with hypomethylating agents significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.72, 95%, confidence interval 0.60-0.85, three trials) and time to transformation or death (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.82, four trials). In a subgroup analysis per type of drug, these benefits could be shown for 5-azacitidine but not for decitabine. Both agents favorably influenced response rates. A higher rate of grade 3/4 adverse events was observed with their use. Since 5-azacitidine prolongs overall survival and time to transformation or death it should be highly considered in the treatment of patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Further studies are needed to establish the exact role of decitabine compared to 5-azacitidine in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available