4.6 Article

Overexpression of GRP78 in complete hydatidiform moles

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages 580-584

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.013

Keywords

GRP78; Hydatidiform moles; Immunohistochemistry; p53; MMP-2; qPCR

Funding

  1. Geneva University Hospital [PRD 07-II-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Hydatidiform moles, subdivided into partial moles (PM) and complete moles (CM), are abnormal pregnancies with a disturbed invasive behavior. We had previously shown that MMP-2 and p53 proteins are overexpressed in CM versus PM, and that in primary cytotrophoblasts p53 protein is stabilized by complexing to the 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) which is involved in cytotrophoblasts invasion process. The present study aims to compare the transcript expression profile of p53, MMP-2 and GRP78 in hydatidiform moles. Methods. A retrospective study was performed by RT-qPCR and immunostaining on paraffin-embedded tissues of 19 PM, 16 CM and 16 control (CTRL) samples of gestational age 8-12 weeks. Results. Expression of MMP-2 transcript was significantly overexpressed in CM compared to CTRL samples (p = 0.031). In contrast, expression of p53 transcript was similar among the samples. This suggests a regulation of p53 in CM at the protein level. GRP78 cDNA was significantly overexpressed in CM compared to CTRL (p = 0.021) and to PM (p = 0.011). At the protein level, immunostaining of GRP78 was on average stronger in CM than PM samples. Conclusions. Collectively, present data suggest that in CM, p53 is normally expressed at the mRNA level but probably complexes at the protein level with the overexpressed GRP78, leading to accumulation of p53 protein. Moreover, since GRP78 and MMP-2 are increased in CM and known to play key roles in invasion, our results suggest that GRP78 and MMP-2 should be investigated as prognostic markers of hydatidiform moles. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available