Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GUT
Volume 64, Issue 8, Pages 1248-1256
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2014-11-22
DOI
10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308362
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Prevalence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Interval Colorectal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Siddharth Singh et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death
- (2014) Douglas A. Corley et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Characteristics and Survival of Interval and Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
- (2013) Rune Erichsen et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis
- (2013) Douglas J Robertson et al. GUT
- Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study
- (2013) Chantal M C le Clercq et al. GUT
- Public reporting of surgeon outcomes: low numbers of procedures lead to false complacency
- (2013) Kate Walker et al. LANCET
- Long-Term Colorectal-Cancer Incidence and Mortality after Lower Endoscopy
- (2013) Reiko Nishihara et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Completeness of case ascertainment and survival time error in English cancer registries: impact on 1-year survival estimates
- (2011) H Møller et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in Medicare beneficiaries
- (2011) Gregory S. Cooper et al. CANCER
- Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Following a Negative Colonoscopy in the Medicare Population
- (2011) Amanpal Singh et al. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
- A population-based comparison of the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in England, Norway and Sweden between 1996 and 2004
- (2011) E. J. A. Morris et al. GUT
- Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study
- (2011) Hermann Brenner et al. GUT
- Rate and Predictors of Early/Missed Colorectal Cancers After Colonoscopy in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study
- (2010) Harminder Singh et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Comparison of treatment and outcome information between a clinical trial and the National Cancer Data Repository
- (2010) E. J. A. Morris et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Analysis of Administrative Data Finds Endoscopist Quality Measures Associated With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer
- (2010) Nancy N. Baxter et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
- (2010) Wendy S Atkin et al. LANCET
- Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data
- (2010) MP Coleman et al. LANCET
- Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
- (2010) Michal F. Kaminski et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Endoscopist Specialty Is Associated With Incident Colorectal Cancer After a Negative Colonoscopy
- (2009) Linda Rabeneck et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Protection From Right- and Left-Sided Colorectal Neoplasms After Colonoscopy: Population-Based Study
- (2009) H. Brenner et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Risk of Developing Proximal Versus Distal Colorectal Cancer After a Negative Colonoscopy: A Population-Based Study
- (2008) Josh Lakoff et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started